A Case Study of DenseNet, ResNet and Vision Transformers for Thyroid Nodule Analysis in Medical Imaging

In order to classify thyroid nodules using ultrasound imaging [1], this study assesses the effectiveness of three deep learning models: Vision Transformer (ViT), DenseNet, and ResNet. Seven thousand thyroid ultrasound pictures from Morocco's Hassan II Hospital (2005–2022) were utilized as the dataset. Accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity were important parameters. DenseNet did somewhat better with 89.3% accuracy and F1-score than ResNet, which had 87.7% accuracy and an 87.8% F1-score. ViT outperformed both, achieving 91.5% accuracy and a 91.4% F1-score, demonstrating superior global context capture. ResNet excels in gradient flow optimization, DenseNet in feature propagation for smaller datasets, and ViT in versatility but requires larger datasets. The study highlights trade-offs between transformer-based and CNN-based architectures, emphasizing the importance of dataset characteristics and task requirements for optimal diagnostic outcomes in medical imaging.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1818
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Case Study of DenseNet, ResNet and Vision Transformers for Thyroid Nodule Analysis in Medical Imaging

Mohamed Chaouki Babahenini, Hamid Aksasse, Karima Bahmane
1 citations
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

A Case Study of DenseNet, ResNet and Vision Transformers for Thyroid Nodule Analysis in Medical Imaging

Mohamed Chaouki Babahenini, Hamid Aksasse, Karima Bahmane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In order to classify thyroid nodules using ultrasound imaging [1], this study assesses the effectiveness of three deep learning models: Vision Transformer (ViT), DenseNet, and ResNet. Seven thousand thyroid ultrasound pictures from Morocco's Hassan II Hospital (2005–2022) were utilized as the dataset. Accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity were important parameters. DenseNet did somewhat better with 89.3% accuracy and F1-score than ResNet, which had 87.7% accuracy and an 87.8% F1-score. ViT outperformed both, achieving 91.5% accuracy and a 91.4% F1-score, demonstrating superior global context capture. ResNet excels in gradient flow optimization, DenseNet in feature propagation for smaller datasets, and ViT in versatility but requires larger datasets. The study highlights trade-offs between transformer-based and CNN-based architectures, emphasizing the importance of dataset characteristics and task requirements for optimal diagnostic outcomes in medical imaging.

Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.