Strategies of Belonging in the Bandung Era: Diasporas and Cold War Asia

Abstract: This article illustrates how the so-called Bandung Moment in the mid-1950s created a dynamic that forced emigrant communities in Asia to adopt new strategies of belonging. It compares the circumstances of three major diasporic communities—the Indonesian Chinese, the Philippine Chinese, and Koreans in Japan. Although the “Bandung era” usually has an undertone of celebrating Third World internationalism, its embrace of such nation-to-nation internationalism came at the expense of these diasporic groups’ previously fluid and ambiguous identities. Many people in these groups decided to commit themselves to the nationalizing projects of their external “homelands,” which also meant siding with one Cold War camp or the other. Our comparison shows that this dynamic was not coincidental but rather intrinsic to Bandung internationalism. It ironically undermined the espoused solidarity against Cold War divisions and instead contributed to deepening these divisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of world history
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2025.a957976
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies of Belonging in the Bandung Era: Diasporas and Cold War Asia

Taomo Zhou, Sayaka Chatani, Chien-Wen Kung
Journal of world history
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
article

Strategies of Belonging in the Bandung Era: Diasporas and Cold War Asia

Taomo Zhou, Sayaka Chatani, Chien-Wen Kung
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article illustrates how the so-called Bandung Moment in the mid-1950s created a dynamic that forced emigrant communities in Asia to adopt new strategies of belonging. It compares the circumstances of three major diasporic communities—the Indonesian Chinese, the Philippine Chinese, and Koreans in Japan. Although the “Bandung era” usually has an undertone of celebrating Third World internationalism, its embrace of such nation-to-nation internationalism came at the expense of these diasporic groups’ previously fluid and ambiguous identities. Many people in these groups decided to commit themselves to the nationalizing projects of their external “homelands,” which also meant siding with one Cold War camp or the other. Our comparison shows that this dynamic was not coincidental but rather intrinsic to Bandung internationalism. It ironically undermined the espoused solidarity against Cold War divisions and instead contributed to deepening these divisions.

Journal of world historyVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.