General conceptions in sociological tensions: The dualism of Niklas Luhmann

Typically, sociology organizes its debates around a series of issues, which are addressed by presenting opposing alternative pairs. Various theoretical exercises shape this task using the notions of dichotomies, dilemmas, and guiding distinctions. In this article, we begin with a review of this literature, focusing on how these approaches conceptualize relationships and the goals they pursue, before supporting our choice to focus on tensions. Subsequently, we adopt Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory as the central empirical reference, using the categories of position, conception, and general conception to guide our analysis. Specifically, we explore his conception in three classic tensions that have structured sociological thought since its foundation: individual/society, referring to the delimitation of the discipline’s object of study; knowledge/reality, concerning the foundation of scientific knowledge; and description/critique, regarding the orientation of sociological practice. Given that dualism predominates in the Luhmannian conception, we complement the analysis of each tension with examples of monistic and integrative conceptions. Finally, the conclusions present the results, outlining the potential of our analytical framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sociology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921251333571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General conceptions in sociological tensions: The dualism of Niklas Luhmann

Pedro Martín Giordano, Gastón Becerra
1 citations
Current Sociology
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
article

General conceptions in sociological tensions: The dualism of Niklas Luhmann

Pedro Martín Giordano, Gastón Becerra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Typically, sociology organizes its debates around a series of issues, which are addressed by presenting opposing alternative pairs. Various theoretical exercises shape this task using the notions of dichotomies, dilemmas, and guiding distinctions. In this article, we begin with a review of this literature, focusing on how these approaches conceptualize relationships and the goals they pursue, before supporting our choice to focus on tensions. Subsequently, we adopt Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory as the central empirical reference, using the categories of position, conception, and general conception to guide our analysis. Specifically, we explore his conception in three classic tensions that have structured sociological thought since its foundation: individual/society, referring to the delimitation of the discipline’s object of study; knowledge/reality, concerning the foundation of scientific knowledge; and description/critique, regarding the orientation of sociological practice. Given that dualism predominates in the Luhmannian conception, we complement the analysis of each tension with examples of monistic and integrative conceptions. Finally, the conclusions present the results, outlining the potential of our analytical framework.

Current SociologyVol. 73(4)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.