Your home is not a school: The limits of homeschooling as a political practice

Homeschooling is on the rise. It appeals to very different perspectives and ideologies that tend not to have common ground, from classical conservative to radical progressive. But the justifications for the practice are weak. In this paper, we build a case against the “home school” as a political practice using the existing commitments of liberal, conservative, and democratic theories of education. Whether education should aim at the cultivation of children's autonomy, their formation as members of cultural communities, or their training as democratic citizens, there are reasons to doubt that the practice of homeschooling can fulfill our educational goals. As such, we argue that liberals, conservatives, and democrats each have their own motivations to oppose homeschooling as an institutional alternative to traditional schools. Through our critiques, we also advance a metatheoretical argument in favor of centering the aims of education in our philosophical and political debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics Philosophy & Economics
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x251335855
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Your home is not a school: The limits of homeschooling as a political practice

Sonia Maria Pavel, Jeremy Kingston Cynamon
Politics Philosophy & Economics
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
article

Your home is not a school: The limits of homeschooling as a political practice

Sonia Maria Pavel, Jeremy Kingston Cynamon
article en

Abstract

Homeschooling is on the rise. It appeals to very different perspectives and ideologies that tend not to have common ground, from classical conservative to radical progressive. But the justifications for the practice are weak. In this paper, we build a case against the “home school” as a political practice using the existing commitments of liberal, conservative, and democratic theories of education. Whether education should aim at the cultivation of children's autonomy, their formation as members of cultural communities, or their training as democratic citizens, there are reasons to doubt that the practice of homeschooling can fulfill our educational goals. As such, we argue that liberals, conservatives, and democrats each have their own motivations to oppose homeschooling as an institutional alternative to traditional schools. Through our critiques, we also advance a metatheoretical argument in favor of centering the aims of education in our philosophical and political debates.

Politics Philosophy & Economics
University of Georgia (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Your home is not a school: The limits of homeschooling as a political practice — Sonia Maria Pavel, Jeremy Kingston Cynamon · Politics Philosophy & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS