How knowledge-source utilization influences adaptation success in turbulent environments: Evidence from transition economies

We investigate the utility of knowledge sources (employees, top management, external sources) for organizational adaptation in contexts of varying environmental turbulence. To successfully adapt, firms require knowledge on what and how to change. Building on the knowledge-based view, we argue that knowledge sources vary in their ability to update knowledge that fits the focal firm’s knowledge requirements. We propose that the source’s focus of attention and recency of interaction with focal firm specificities influence the source’s knowledge-updating ability. Survey data from 438 firms in four transition economies indicate that as turbulence increases employees have higher utility regarding what to change, while top management demonstrates higher utility regarding how to implement changes. Our work provides theoretical insight on the contingent effect of environmental turbulence on knowledge-source utility. JEL Classification: L1, M1, P2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251319725
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How knowledge-source utilization influences adaptation success in turbulent environments: Evidence from transition economies

George A. Shinkle, Aldas Kriauciunas, Mirjam Goudsmit
Australian Journal of Management
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

How knowledge-source utilization influences adaptation success in turbulent environments: Evidence from transition economies

George A. Shinkle, Aldas Kriauciunas, Mirjam Goudsmit
article en

Abstract

We investigate the utility of knowledge sources (employees, top management, external sources) for organizational adaptation in contexts of varying environmental turbulence. To successfully adapt, firms require knowledge on what and how to change. Building on the knowledge-based view, we argue that knowledge sources vary in their ability to update knowledge that fits the focal firm’s knowledge requirements. We propose that the source’s focus of attention and recency of interaction with focal firm specificities influence the source’s knowledge-updating ability. Survey data from 438 firms in four transition economies indicate that as turbulence increases employees have higher utility regarding what to change, while top management demonstrates higher utility regarding how to implement changes. Our work provides theoretical insight on the contingent effect of environmental turbulence on knowledge-source utility. JEL Classification: L1, M1, P2

Australian Journal of ManagementVol. 51(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), UNSW Sydney (AU), Michigan State University (US)
Purdue University, Australian Government, Sylff Association, University of New South Wales, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How knowledge-source utilization influences adaptation success in turbulent environments: Evidence from transition economies — George A. Shinkle, Aldas Kriauciunas, et al. · Australian Journal of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS