Rethinking the use of population descriptors in dermatology trials and beyond: disentangling race and ethnicity from skin color

There is an urgent need to reconsider the use of race and ethnicity as population descriptors in dermatology research. Current systems, which conflate social identity with biological markers, perpetuate health disparities and limit the accuracy of clinical data. Moving forward, more specific descriptors such as skin color, alongside socially determined factors, will be crucial in achieving meaningful diversity and inclusivity in clinical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Dermatological Research
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-025-04219-6
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the use of population descriptors in dermatology trials and beyond: disentangling race and ethnicity from skin color

Jade Lewis, Angel S. Byrd, Nina G. Jablonski, Cheryl Burgess et al.
Archives of Dermatological Research
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

Rethinking the use of population descriptors in dermatology trials and beyond: disentangling race and ethnicity from skin color

Jade Lewis, Angel S. Byrd, Nina G. Jablonski, Cheryl Burgess, Roxana Daneshjou, Caryn Cobb, Jane Yoo, Stafford G. Brown, Jenna Lester, Andrew F Alexis, Junko Takeshita, Yvette Miller-Monthrope, Chidubem A. V. Okeke, Valerie Dawn Callender, Tarannum Jaleel, Candrice Heath, Seemal R. Desai, Susan C. Taylor, Suephy C. Chen, Valerie M. Harvey, Jonathan Weiss, Amy J McMichael, Hema Sundaram
article en

Abstract

There is an urgent need to reconsider the use of race and ethnicity as population descriptors in dermatology research. Current systems, which conflate social identity with biological markers, perpetuate health disparities and limit the accuracy of clinical data. Moving forward, more specific descriptors such as skin color, alongside socially determined factors, will be crucial in achieving meaningful diversity and inclusivity in clinical research.

Archives of Dermatological ResearchVol. 317(1)
Mount Auburn Hospital (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University Health Network (CA), Harvard University (US), Howard University (US), Emory University (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), Women's College Hospital (CA), University of Manchester (GB), Lander Institute (IL), Cosmetic Laser Dermatology (US), Gwinnett Dermatology (US), Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.