A COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK AND INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK USING COSTOCLAVICULAR APPROACH FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY

Brachial plexus block through USG guided Supraclavicular or Infraclavicular approach is a commonly used anesthetic technique for Upper Extremity surgeries. Recently, utilization of costoclavicular space for infraclavicular block has been suggested as a suitable approach for brachial plexus block with various beneficial advantages. Objective: The present study is proposed to compare the efficacy of USG guided Supraclavicular and Costoclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery. Methodology: Seventy ASA Grade I/II patients scheduled to undergo upper extremity surgery will be randomised either to ultrasound-guided costoclavicular approach of infraclavicular block (Group A) and supraclavicular block (Group B) respectively. All patients will be assessed for block success, onset time, sensory and motor block scores, duration of block, postoperative pain and need for rescue analgesic. Data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Independent samples 't'-test, paired 't'-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and chi-square test will be used . Result: Onset Time: Group A(6.00 min median) vs. Group B (7.00 min median). Mean onset time (6.23 min vs. 6.63 min) was not significantly different (p = 0.119). Block Duration: Group B had slightly longer motor (357.43 min vs. 347.71 min) and sensory (400.86 min vs. 388.57 min) blocks, but differences were not statistically significant. Rescue Analgesia: First dose timing was similar between groups (Group A: 564.00 min vs. Group B: 570.00 min, p = 0.612). Pain Scores: At 12 hours, Group B had higher pain scores (2.00 vs. 1.83, p < 0.05). Other time points showed no significant differences. Satisfaction: No significant difference in satisfaction, with most patients being satisfied (Group A: 65.7%, Group B: 68.6%). Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of block onset, duration, or satisfaction, but Group B had slightly higher pain at 12 hours post-procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/1605283
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK AND INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK USING COSTOCLAVICULAR APPROACH FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY

Rachna Verma, Amra Nadeem, Mohammad Nasim Akhtar
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

A COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR BLOCK AND INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK USING COSTOCLAVICULAR APPROACH FOR UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY

Rachna Verma, Amra Nadeem, Mohammad Nasim Akhtar
article en

Abstract

Brachial plexus block through USG guided Supraclavicular or Infraclavicular approach is a commonly used anesthetic technique for Upper Extremity surgeries. Recently, utilization of costoclavicular space for infraclavicular block has been suggested as a suitable approach for brachial plexus block with various beneficial advantages. Objective: The present study is proposed to compare the efficacy of USG guided Supraclavicular and Costoclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery. Methodology: Seventy ASA Grade I/II patients scheduled to undergo upper extremity surgery will be randomised either to ultrasound-guided costoclavicular approach of infraclavicular block (Group A) and supraclavicular block (Group B) respectively. All patients will be assessed for block success, onset time, sensory and motor block scores, duration of block, postoperative pain and need for rescue analgesic. Data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Independent samples 't'-test, paired 't'-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and chi-square test will be used . Result: Onset Time: Group A(6.00 min median) vs. Group B (7.00 min median). Mean onset time (6.23 min vs. 6.63 min) was not significantly different (p = 0.119). Block Duration: Group B had slightly longer motor (357.43 min vs. 347.71 min) and sensory (400.86 min vs. 388.57 min) blocks, but differences were not statistically significant. Rescue Analgesia: First dose timing was similar between groups (Group A: 564.00 min vs. Group B: 570.00 min, p = 0.612). Pain Scores: At 12 hours, Group B had higher pain scores (2.00 vs. 1.83, p < 0.05). Other time points showed no significant differences. Satisfaction: No significant difference in satisfaction, with most patients being satisfied (Group A: 65.7%, Group B: 68.6%). Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of block onset, duration, or satisfaction, but Group B had slightly higher pain at 12 hours post-procedure.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.