The challenges of surveying in war zones: Lessons from Ukraine

Abstract Conflict scholars commonly employ public opinion surveys to understand the causes and consequences of violence. However, surveying in wartime presents a distinctive set of challenges. We examine two challenges facing polling in countries at war: under-coverage of national samples and response bias. Although these issues are acknowledged in the literature on surveying methods, they become significantly more pronounced in war zones due to the geographic clustering of violence and the heightened sensitivity surrounding certain opinions. We illustrate these challenges in the context of the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war, drawing on original panel survey data tracing the attitudes of the same people in Ukraine prior to and after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. We show that unit and item non-response bias in surveys conducted during the war are related to respondents’ political orientation, particularly their support for NATO membership measured in 2019. We conclude with lessons for those employing survey methods in wartime, and point to steps forward, in Ukraine and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433251321763
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenges of surveying in war zones: Lessons from Ukraine

Kit Rickard, John Ο’Loughlin, Gerard Toal, Kristin M. Bakke
4 citations
Journal of Peace Research
Census and Population Estimation
10.52
article

The challenges of surveying in war zones: Lessons from Ukraine

Kit Rickard, John Ο’Loughlin, Gerard Toal, Kristin M. Bakke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Conflict scholars commonly employ public opinion surveys to understand the causes and consequences of violence. However, surveying in wartime presents a distinctive set of challenges. We examine two challenges facing polling in countries at war: under-coverage of national samples and response bias. Although these issues are acknowledged in the literature on surveying methods, they become significantly more pronounced in war zones due to the geographic clustering of violence and the heightened sensitivity surrounding certain opinions. We illustrate these challenges in the context of the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war, drawing on original panel survey data tracing the attitudes of the same people in Ukraine prior to and after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. We show that unit and item non-response bias in surveys conducted during the war are related to respondents’ political orientation, particularly their support for NATO membership measured in 2019. We conclude with lessons for those employing survey methods in wartime, and point to steps forward, in Ukraine and beyond.

Journal of Peace ResearchVol. 62(6)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), ETH Zurich (CH), The London College (GB), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), Center for Security Studies (GR), University College London (GB), Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Census and Population Estimation
10.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The challenges of surveying in war zones: Lessons from Ukraine — Kit Rickard, John Ο’Loughlin, et al. · Journal of Peace Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS