Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

The rise of intelligent technologies is believed to change job requirements, urging individuals to engage in work-related learning to stay employable. Studies on workers’ learning participation found that employees who are most at risk of automation are least likely to engage in work-related learning. To better understand this paradox, this study investigates to what extent differences in work-related learning for technological adaptation are explained by (a) workers’ actual automation risk, (b) their subjective perception of automation risks, (c) differences in their learning intention, and (d) access to lifelong development opportunities and supportive learning environments. Novel survey data on Dutch employees ( N = 1,719) are used. The results based on (generalized) structural equation modeling show that differences in learning between high- and low-risk workers can be explained by workers’ differences in their learning intentions and their (perceived) access to education and supportive learning environments, but not by their subjective perceptions of automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251331749
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

Suzanne Janssen, Giedo Jansen, Marie-Christine Fregin, Mark Levels
2 citations
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
5.53
article

Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

Suzanne Janssen, Giedo Jansen, Marie-Christine Fregin, Mark Levels
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The rise of intelligent technologies is believed to change job requirements, urging individuals to engage in work-related learning to stay employable. Studies on workers’ learning participation found that employees who are most at risk of automation are least likely to engage in work-related learning. To better understand this paradox, this study investigates to what extent differences in work-related learning for technological adaptation are explained by (a) workers’ actual automation risk, (b) their subjective perception of automation risks, (c) differences in their learning intention, and (d) access to lifelong development opportunities and supportive learning environments. Novel survey data on Dutch employees ( N = 1,719) are used. The results based on (generalized) structural equation modeling show that differences in learning between high- and low-risk workers can be explained by workers’ differences in their learning intentions and their (perceived) access to education and supportive learning environments, but not by their subjective perceptions of automation.

Economic and Industrial Democracy
Maastricht University (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Twente (NL)
European Commission, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.