Assessing the Problem-Solving Abilities and their Difficulties in Learning Mathematics as Basis for Instructional Strategies Framework

Problem-solving abilities in mathematics are essential for developing critical thinking and analytical skills, enabling students to apply logical reasoning to real-world situations. Understanding the strategies and challenges students face in mathematical problem-solving can help educators design more effective instructional approaches to enhance learning outcomes. This study focused on assessing the problem – solving abilities and difficulties in learning mathematics as basis for instructional strategies of Grade 9 students of San Miguel National High School. A total of 110 students were respondents including 30 experts for acceptability of instructional strategies framework. Respondents were selected through total enumeration. This study employed Research and Development (R&D) research design. The main research instrument employed in this study was the researchers’ made questionnaire covering some topics of third quarter in the most essential learning competency of grade 9. Mean and standard deviation determined the student’s problem-solving abilities and difficulties as classified in Level of SOLO Taxonomy. For the acceptability of students and experts, mean and standard deviation was also employed. One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant difference on the problem – solving abilities of students when classified in Level of SOLO Taxonomy. The study revealed that findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance students’ problem-solving skills, particularly in re-examining solutions. Moreover, for experts, instructional strategies framework is generally well-received and considered suitable for implementation in educational settings. Hence, the data indicate that the instructional strategies framework is well-accepted by students, demonstrating effectiveness in various aspects of learning. Lastly, the ANOVA results revealed that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the problem-solving abilities of students significantly differ across the classifications of the SOLO Taxonomy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90300336
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Problem-Solving Abilities and their Difficulties in Learning Mathematics as Basis for Instructional Strategies Framework

Allan Jay S. Cajandig, Baby-Lyn D. Mangilala
1 citations
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Assessing the Problem-Solving Abilities and their Difficulties in Learning Mathematics as Basis for Instructional Strategies Framework

Allan Jay S. Cajandig, Baby-Lyn D. Mangilala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Problem-solving abilities in mathematics are essential for developing critical thinking and analytical skills, enabling students to apply logical reasoning to real-world situations. Understanding the strategies and challenges students face in mathematical problem-solving can help educators design more effective instructional approaches to enhance learning outcomes. This study focused on assessing the problem – solving abilities and difficulties in learning mathematics as basis for instructional strategies of Grade 9 students of San Miguel National High School. A total of 110 students were respondents including 30 experts for acceptability of instructional strategies framework. Respondents were selected through total enumeration. This study employed Research and Development (R&D) research design. The main research instrument employed in this study was the researchers’ made questionnaire covering some topics of third quarter in the most essential learning competency of grade 9. Mean and standard deviation determined the student’s problem-solving abilities and difficulties as classified in Level of SOLO Taxonomy. For the acceptability of students and experts, mean and standard deviation was also employed. One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant difference on the problem – solving abilities of students when classified in Level of SOLO Taxonomy. The study revealed that findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance students’ problem-solving skills, particularly in re-examining solutions. Moreover, for experts, instructional strategies framework is generally well-received and considered suitable for implementation in educational settings. Hence, the data indicate that the instructional strategies framework is well-accepted by students, demonstrating effectiveness in various aspects of learning. Lastly, the ANOVA results revealed that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the problem-solving abilities of students significantly differ across the classifications of the SOLO Taxonomy.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(III)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the Problem-Solving Abilities and their Difficulties in Learning Mathematics as Basis for Instructional Strategies Framework — Allan Jay S. Cajandig, Baby-Lyn D. Mangilala · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS