Resolving the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency for instrumented macroindentation based local mechanical properties

In case the distribution of mechanical material properties is inhomogeneous, for example in welded joints, an indentation based measure can be adopted to obtain local estimates. However, the property precision and accuracy is often lacking and a next step to reveal the one-to-one relation between instrumented macroindentation and material stress strain curve was set, proposing semi-analytical model improvements and deploying Monte Carlo based numerical model simulations for verification. Utilizing experimental data for DH36 and S355 steel, high-precision Young’s modulus estimates were obtained within 95 [%] reliability of the uniaxial tensile test reference values and less than a 10 [%] error. For high reliability, the number of indentation tests must be sufficiently large. Contact radius information is at least required to obtain the yield strength and several formulations provide estimates within ∼ 20 [%] error for a large range of material properties. A significantly more accurate value can be obtained if the Young’s modulus is not involved, providing an error within 10 [%]. Introducing a proportional plastic strain offset criterion rather than the well-established constant one to obtain an indentation based yield strength estimate, the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency was eliminated. Accuracy is improved to a ∼ 20 [%] error range with 95 [%] reliability. Using the material proof strength rather than the yield strength even reduces the 95 [%] reliability error estimate to ∼ 15 [%]. Experimental instrumented macroindentation based yield strength estimates are within 10 [%] error compared to the uniaxial tensile test values. • Proposed novel spherical macroindentation based local mechanical properties model. • Improved indentation based strength-to-stiffness independent yield strength estimate. • Explored precision and accuracy of three contact radius models. • Verified model using Monte Carlo FE simulations. • Validated model using tensile tests and macroindentation tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.041
Primary Topic
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency for instrumented macroindentation based local mechanical properties

Natalia Millan-Espitia, Henk den Besten, Surya R. Kalidindi, Nicolaas Cornelis Hugo Troost et al.
4 links
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
article

Resolving the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency for instrumented macroindentation based local mechanical properties

Natalia Millan-Espitia, Henk den Besten, Surya R. Kalidindi, Nicolaas Cornelis Hugo Troost, Sagar Gupta, Vera Popovich
article en

Abstract

In case the distribution of mechanical material properties is inhomogeneous, for example in welded joints, an indentation based measure can be adopted to obtain local estimates. However, the property precision and accuracy is often lacking and a next step to reveal the one-to-one relation between instrumented macroindentation and material stress strain curve was set, proposing semi-analytical model improvements and deploying Monte Carlo based numerical model simulations for verification. Utilizing experimental data for DH36 and S355 steel, high-precision Young’s modulus estimates were obtained within 95 [%] reliability of the uniaxial tensile test reference values and less than a 10 [%] error. For high reliability, the number of indentation tests must be sufficiently large. Contact radius information is at least required to obtain the yield strength and several formulations provide estimates within ∼ 20 [%] error for a large range of material properties. A significantly more accurate value can be obtained if the Young’s modulus is not involved, providing an error within 10 [%]. Introducing a proportional plastic strain offset criterion rather than the well-established constant one to obtain an indentation based yield strength estimate, the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency was eliminated. Accuracy is improved to a ∼ 20 [%] error range with 95 [%] reliability. Using the material proof strength rather than the yield strength even reduces the 95 [%] reliability error estimate to ∼ 15 [%]. Experimental instrumented macroindentation based yield strength estimates are within 10 [%] error compared to the uniaxial tensile test values. • Proposed novel spherical macroindentation based local mechanical properties model. • Improved indentation based strength-to-stiffness independent yield strength estimate. • Explored precision and accuracy of three contact radius models. • Verified model using Monte Carlo FE simulations. • Validated model using tensile tests and macroindentation tests.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 36
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.