Will China’s territorial spatial planning policies enhance land use sustainability? An integrated assessment under global environmental change

Land use sustainability (LUS) has exhibited profound impacts on addressing global change and achieving sustainable development. Although numerous policies have been implemented to improve LUS, their effectiveness remains unclear. This study builds an integrated assessment to model LUS dynamics in China for 2035 under nine scenarios, combining Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), and three land use policy-oriented scenarios: Business As Usual (BAU), Biodiversity and Agricultural Adaptation (BAA), and Chinese Territorial Spatial Planning (TSP). Using the global change analysis model and future land use simulation model, we quantify changes and interactions among Ecological Sustainability (ES), Production Sustainability (PS), and Living Sustainability (LS). Under BAU, ES declines are predominant – with improvements observed in only 5 provinces under SSP126 and SSP245, and 3 provinces under SSP460 – while significant trade-offs emerge between ES-PS and PS-LS, with modest ES-LS synergy. In contrast, BAA outperforms enhancing average LUS, while TSP yields the most optimal outcomes. Specifically, under SSP126-TSP, up to 22 provinces show highest ES and LS, and PS peaks in 24 provinces. Meanwhile, Pearson correlation coefficient between ES-LS synergy reaches 0.46 under SSP126-TSP. Overall, TSP markedly reduces trade-offs and fosters synergies across all dimensions. These findings highlight TSP’s critical role in sustainable land use and provide actionable insights for policymaking to achieve sustainable development goals in China and globally. • Simulate land use sustainability dynamics under global changes and local policies. • China’s Territorial Spatial Planning policies greatly enhance land use sustainability. • The effectiveness of land use policies varies by regions and future scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100228
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will China’s territorial spatial planning policies enhance land use sustainability? An integrated assessment under global environmental change

Yong Liu, Bryan C. Pijanowski, Haoxuan Xia, Wenze Yue et al.
11 citations
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
12.16
article

Will China’s territorial spatial planning policies enhance land use sustainability? An integrated assessment under global environmental change

Yong Liu, Bryan C. Pijanowski, Haoxuan Xia, Wenze Yue, Tianyu Wang, Jinhui Xiong
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Land use sustainability (LUS) has exhibited profound impacts on addressing global change and achieving sustainable development. Although numerous policies have been implemented to improve LUS, their effectiveness remains unclear. This study builds an integrated assessment to model LUS dynamics in China for 2035 under nine scenarios, combining Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), and three land use policy-oriented scenarios: Business As Usual (BAU), Biodiversity and Agricultural Adaptation (BAA), and Chinese Territorial Spatial Planning (TSP). Using the global change analysis model and future land use simulation model, we quantify changes and interactions among Ecological Sustainability (ES), Production Sustainability (PS), and Living Sustainability (LS). Under BAU, ES declines are predominant – with improvements observed in only 5 provinces under SSP126 and SSP245, and 3 provinces under SSP460 – while significant trade-offs emerge between ES-PS and PS-LS, with modest ES-LS synergy. In contrast, BAA outperforms enhancing average LUS, while TSP yields the most optimal outcomes. Specifically, under SSP126-TSP, up to 22 provinces show highest ES and LS, and PS peaks in 24 provinces. Meanwhile, Pearson correlation coefficient between ES-LS synergy reaches 0.46 under SSP126-TSP. Overall, TSP markedly reduces trade-offs and fosters synergies across all dimensions. These findings highlight TSP’s critical role in sustainable land use and provide actionable insights for policymaking to achieve sustainable development goals in China and globally. • Simulate land use sustainability dynamics under global changes and local policies. • China’s Territorial Spatial Planning policies greatly enhance land use sustainability. • The effectiveness of land use policies varies by regions and future scenarios.

Resources Environment and SustainabilityVol. 21
Chongqing University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Zhejiang University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council, National University's Basic Research Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
12.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.