Holistic systems thinking underpins Vermont soil health practitioners’ preferences and beliefs

• Vermont soil health practitioners use a holistic definition of soil health. • Practitioners rated all 12 soil health indicators tested as useful or important. • Ratings of soil health metrics in general do not vary across decision contexts. • Vermont farmer climate change beliefs predict perceived importance of soil health. The concept of soil health has potential to catalyze agricultural transformation, though the breadth of the concept may stifle action. The impact of the soil health concept on practice depends on how well the concept is understood by diverse agricultural practitioners, including farmers, extension, and researchers. We use two surveys of soil health practitioners, or those that manage or influence soil, to examine soil health preferences and beliefs. Both surveys are from Vermont, USA, a region consisting mostly of small-to-medium scale farms: survey one queried Vermont soil health practitioners in the fall of 2020 ( n = 62) and survey two queried just Vermont farmers in the spring of 2022 ( n = 179). Analysis included qualitative coding and statistical analyses, including t -tests, ANOVA and information theory-informed regression analysis. In study one, Vermont practitioners' definitions include the holistic dimensions of soil health as a living ecosystem, the underlying conditions for life to thrive, the production of ecosystem services, and enhancing resilience. Additionally, practitioners rate biological, chemical, and physical indicators as very useful and important, and these ratings do not, in general, vary between decision contexts. In study two, Vermont farmers perceive the benefits of soil health. The importance of soil health is best predicted by beliefs in climate change. Together these studies suggest that in Vermont, the concept of soil health is aligned with systems-oriented thinking about resilient agricultural systems. We conclude that systems thinking is an important factor for improving soil health and practice adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Security
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100186
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic systems thinking underpins Vermont soil health practitioners’ preferences and beliefs

Deborah A. Neher, Brendan Fisher, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Eric Bishop von Wettberg et al.
1 citations
Soil Security
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
article

Holistic systems thinking underpins Vermont soil health practitioners’ preferences and beliefs

Deborah A. Neher, Brendan Fisher, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Eric Bishop von Wettberg, Alissa White, Catherine Horner, Mojtaba Zeraatpisheh, Gillian L. Galford, Heather Darby, Joshua W. Faulkner, Patrick M. Ewing, W. D. Jones, Cari Ritzenthaler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Vermont soil health practitioners use a holistic definition of soil health. • Practitioners rated all 12 soil health indicators tested as useful or important. • Ratings of soil health metrics in general do not vary across decision contexts. • Vermont farmer climate change beliefs predict perceived importance of soil health. The concept of soil health has potential to catalyze agricultural transformation, though the breadth of the concept may stifle action. The impact of the soil health concept on practice depends on how well the concept is understood by diverse agricultural practitioners, including farmers, extension, and researchers. We use two surveys of soil health practitioners, or those that manage or influence soil, to examine soil health preferences and beliefs. Both surveys are from Vermont, USA, a region consisting mostly of small-to-medium scale farms: survey one queried Vermont soil health practitioners in the fall of 2020 ( n = 62) and survey two queried just Vermont farmers in the spring of 2022 ( n = 179). Analysis included qualitative coding and statistical analyses, including t -tests, ANOVA and information theory-informed regression analysis. In study one, Vermont practitioners' definitions include the holistic dimensions of soil health as a living ecosystem, the underlying conditions for life to thrive, the production of ecosystem services, and enhancing resilience. Additionally, practitioners rate biological, chemical, and physical indicators as very useful and important, and these ratings do not, in general, vary between decision contexts. In study two, Vermont farmers perceive the benefits of soil health. The importance of soil health is best predicted by beliefs in climate change. Together these studies suggest that in Vermont, the concept of soil health is aligned with systems-oriented thinking about resilient agricultural systems. We conclude that systems thinking is an important factor for improving soil health and practice adoption.

Soil SecurityVol. 19
University of Vermont (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), American Farmland Trust (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.