A Comparative Study of PID, FOPID, ISF, SMC, and FLC Controllers for DC Motor Speed Control with Particle Swarm Optimization

Direct Current (DC) motors are extensively used in various applications due to their versatile and precise control capabilities. However, they face operational challenges such as speed instability and sensitivity to load variations and external disturbances. This study compares the performance of several advanced control methods—Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Fractional Order PID (FOPID), Integral State Feedback (ISF), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), and Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) for DC motor control. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is employed to optimize the tuning parameters of PID, FOPID, ISF, and SMC controllers, while FLC is implemented without optimization. The simulation results indicate that the PSO-FOPID controller exhibits the best overall performance, characterized by the fastest rise and settling times and the lowest ITSE, despite a minor overshoot. The PSO-PID controller also performs well, with fast response times, although it is less efficient in terms of settling time and ITSE compared to PSO-FOPID. The OBL/HGSO-PID controller, while stable and overshoot-free, has a slower response. The PSO-ISF controller shows the highest stability with the lowest SSE values, making it suitable for applications requiring high stability. The PSO-SMC controller demonstrates good stability but is slightly slower than PSO-ISF. The FLC controller, however, performs the worst, with significant overshoot and long recovery times, making it unsuitable for fast and precise control applications. The robustness analysis under varying motor parameters further confirms the superiority of the PSO-FOPID controller, which outperforms OBL/HGSO and OBL-MRFO-SA optimizations across both PID and FOPID controllers, making it the most effective solution for applications requiring high precision and rapid response.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v5i1.1764
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of PID, FOPID, ISF, SMC, and FLC Controllers for DC Motor Speed Control with Particle Swarm Optimization

Wael A. Salah, Alfian Ma’arif, Muhammad Haryo Setiawan, Much. Fuad Saifuddin
1 citations
International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems
Advanced Control Systems Design
1.21
article

A Comparative Study of PID, FOPID, ISF, SMC, and FLC Controllers for DC Motor Speed Control with Particle Swarm Optimization

Wael A. Salah, Alfian Ma’arif, Muhammad Haryo Setiawan, Much. Fuad Saifuddin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Direct Current (DC) motors are extensively used in various applications due to their versatile and precise control capabilities. However, they face operational challenges such as speed instability and sensitivity to load variations and external disturbances. This study compares the performance of several advanced control methods—Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Fractional Order PID (FOPID), Integral State Feedback (ISF), Sliding Mode Control (SMC), and Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) for DC motor control. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is employed to optimize the tuning parameters of PID, FOPID, ISF, and SMC controllers, while FLC is implemented without optimization. The simulation results indicate that the PSO-FOPID controller exhibits the best overall performance, characterized by the fastest rise and settling times and the lowest ITSE, despite a minor overshoot. The PSO-PID controller also performs well, with fast response times, although it is less efficient in terms of settling time and ITSE compared to PSO-FOPID. The OBL/HGSO-PID controller, while stable and overshoot-free, has a slower response. The PSO-ISF controller shows the highest stability with the lowest SSE values, making it suitable for applications requiring high stability. The PSO-SMC controller demonstrates good stability but is slightly slower than PSO-ISF. The FLC controller, however, performs the worst, with significant overshoot and long recovery times, making it unsuitable for fast and precise control applications. The robustness analysis under varying motor parameters further confirms the superiority of the PSO-FOPID controller, which outperforms OBL/HGSO and OBL-MRFO-SA optimizations across both PID and FOPID controllers, making it the most effective solution for applications requiring high precision and rapid response.

International Journal of Robotics and Control SystemsVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Control Systems Design
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study of PID, FOPID, ISF, SMC, and FLC Controllers for DC Motor Speed Control with Particle Swarm Optimization — Wael A. Salah, Alfian Ma’arif, et al. · International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS