Resource recovery strategies and schemes: A regional case study on sewage sludge hub centres in Italy

The establishment of regional sludge treatment hubs has been proposed as a solution to achieve the necessary economic scale for sustainable resource recovery and safe reuse in non-metropolitan areas. However, existing literature provides limited insights into their sustainability and effectiveness, and inadequate legal frameworks often hinder efficient sludge treatment, leading to improper disposal and increased risks. This article addresses these gaps by evaluating the environmental impact of a centralised sludge treatment system through a real case study, highlighting the importance of selecting sewage sludge with minimal risks for centralised resource recovery and safe reuse, in line with the recent review of the Sewage Sludge Directive. Building on the Horizon 2020 SMART-Plant innovation action, a regional sludge hub has been designed to treat and valorise the sewage sludge from 52 municipalities in Treviso, serving around 500,000 residents. In the first phase, the potential for resource recovery and safe reuse was assessed by evaluating the long-term chemical and physical characteristics of the sewage sludge, while considering the replicability of this model. In the second phase, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impact of various valorisation pathways, including composting, biogas production, phosphorus salts, and biopolymer (PHA) recovery. The final environmental impacts were normalised using the revised ReCiPe 2016 normalisation values. The results indicated that phosphorus and biopolymer recovery was the most sustainable scenario, reducing emissions by an amount equivalent to 176 individuals per day compared to the decentralised system. • Eco-innovative resource recovery technologies are applied at full scale. • Regional sludge characteristics were assessed in the view of a risk-based approach. • Regional scenarios of wastewater treatment are compared with Life Cycle Assessment. • The centralised sludge treatment improves the eutrophication emissions by up to 96 %. • Combined struvite and biopolymers recovery is the most sustainable option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107696
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource recovery strategies and schemes: A regional case study on sewage sludge hub centres in Italy

Alessia Foglia, Francesco Fatone, Nicola Frison, Alberto Piasentin et al.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Resource recovery strategies and schemes: A regional case study on sewage sludge hub centres in Italy

Alessia Foglia, Francesco Fatone, Nicola Frison, Alberto Piasentin, Elisa Blumenthal, Corinne Andreola, Anna Laura Eusebi
article en

Abstract

The establishment of regional sludge treatment hubs has been proposed as a solution to achieve the necessary economic scale for sustainable resource recovery and safe reuse in non-metropolitan areas. However, existing literature provides limited insights into their sustainability and effectiveness, and inadequate legal frameworks often hinder efficient sludge treatment, leading to improper disposal and increased risks. This article addresses these gaps by evaluating the environmental impact of a centralised sludge treatment system through a real case study, highlighting the importance of selecting sewage sludge with minimal risks for centralised resource recovery and safe reuse, in line with the recent review of the Sewage Sludge Directive. Building on the Horizon 2020 SMART-Plant innovation action, a regional sludge hub has been designed to treat and valorise the sewage sludge from 52 municipalities in Treviso, serving around 500,000 residents. In the first phase, the potential for resource recovery and safe reuse was assessed by evaluating the long-term chemical and physical characteristics of the sewage sludge, while considering the replicability of this model. In the second phase, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to evaluate the environmental impact of various valorisation pathways, including composting, biogas production, phosphorus salts, and biopolymer (PHA) recovery. The final environmental impacts were normalised using the revised ReCiPe 2016 normalisation values. The results indicated that phosphorus and biopolymer recovery was the most sustainable scenario, reducing emissions by an amount equivalent to 176 individuals per day compared to the decentralised system. • Eco-innovative resource recovery technologies are applied at full scale. • Regional sludge characteristics were assessed in the view of a risk-based approach. • Regional scenarios of wastewater treatment are compared with Life Cycle Assessment. • The centralised sludge treatment improves the eutrophication emissions by up to 96 %. • Combined struvite and biopolymers recovery is the most sustainable option.

Journal of Water Process EngineeringVol. 73
University of Verona (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana (IT)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.