Value-led fusion technology: A framework for guiding fusion commercialisation strategy

A value-led perspective is proposed as a basis for optimising development of commercial fusion technologies. Strategic consequences are outlined, including recommendations for maximising the value generated by global research programmes in aggregate. Specifically: A wide variety of small devices, capable of delivering heat, should be all explored as soon as possible, in parallel, and likely with considerably larger funding efforts than are exerted today. To maximise these uncertain benefits brought by a potential, future fusion industry, comprehensive measures of value should be embedded within decision and design processes — from national strategies to individual device components. • Maximising social returns of fusion technology demands strategic change. • Risk should be optimised, not minimised, by pursuing multiple devices at scale. • Devices should be small, quick to build, and aim to sell heat. • Roadmaps should either be abandoned or front-loaded with risk. • Value measures should be embedded and comprehensive — including time, risk and volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114576
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value-led fusion technology: A framework for guiding fusion commercialisation strategy

S.H. Ward, N.J. Lopes Cardozo
2 citations
Energy Policy
Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
2.65
article

Value-led fusion technology: A framework for guiding fusion commercialisation strategy

S.H. Ward, N.J. Lopes Cardozo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A value-led perspective is proposed as a basis for optimising development of commercial fusion technologies. Strategic consequences are outlined, including recommendations for maximising the value generated by global research programmes in aggregate. Specifically: A wide variety of small devices, capable of delivering heat, should be all explored as soon as possible, in parallel, and likely with considerably larger funding efforts than are exerted today. To maximise these uncertain benefits brought by a potential, future fusion industry, comprehensive measures of value should be embedded within decision and design processes — from national strategies to individual device components. • Maximising social returns of fusion technology demands strategic change. • Risk should be optimised, not minimised, by pursuing multiple devices at scale. • Devices should be small, quick to build, and aim to sell heat. • Roadmaps should either be abandoned or front-loaded with risk. • Value measures should be embedded and comprehensive — including time, risk and volume.

Energy PolicyVol. 203
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables, EUROfusion, European Commission, Euratom Research and Training Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.