Kant and Overdemandingness II: The Demandingness of Perfect Duties

ABSTRACT In this paper, we consider how demandingness objections pertain to perfect duties in Kantian ethics. We revisit the framework of demandingness that we introduced in a previous paper, before introducing three cases that have been suggested to constitute problems for Kant, specifically regarding perfect duties. We argue that some of these cases do constitute problems for the Kantian framework, but the complaint of overdemandingness obfuscates other issues. In particular, we suggest that Kantian ethics may benefit from a theory of goods. However, we observe that supplementing Kantian ethics in this way may yield a number of further difficulties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Compass
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70033
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant and Overdemandingness II: The Demandingness of Perfect Duties

Joe Slater, Joe Saunders, Martin Sticker
Philosophy Compass
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant and Overdemandingness II: The Demandingness of Perfect Duties

Joe Slater, Joe Saunders, Martin Sticker
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we consider how demandingness objections pertain to perfect duties in Kantian ethics. We revisit the framework of demandingness that we introduced in a previous paper, before introducing three cases that have been suggested to constitute problems for Kant, specifically regarding perfect duties. We argue that some of these cases do constitute problems for the Kantian framework, but the complaint of overdemandingness obfuscates other issues. In particular, we suggest that Kantian ethics may benefit from a theory of goods. However, we observe that supplementing Kantian ethics in this way may yield a number of further difficulties.

Philosophy CompassVol. 20(4)
Durham University (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.