A governance perspective on agri-environmental schemes: Actors, roles, and barriers

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) carry significant environmental expectations. However, their environmental performance has often been questioned. Existing research has tackled the issue from ecological and economic perspectives. This study aims to provide a complementary governance perspective. It first develops a theoretical framework to analyze AES governance through a multilevel lens, identifying three distinct levels based on different actors' roles: macro (setting policy boundaries), meso (implementation of the policy framework), and micro (farmer actions). Second, this study develops an analytical framework to investigate barriers hindering AES environmental performance and their linkage to AES governance. The combined frameworks have been tested in a regional case study in the Hauts-de-France region. A list of 40 barriers is identified, spanning organizational, power dynamics, and financial issues. Barriers are not confined to farm or policy scale, distributing unevenly across governance levels, with different agencies across roles and actors in unlocking the AES performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02182-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A governance perspective on agri-environmental schemes: Actors, roles, and barriers

Diana Borniotto, Philippe V. Baret, Clémentine Antier
3 citations
AMBIO
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
9.08
article

A governance perspective on agri-environmental schemes: Actors, roles, and barriers

Diana Borniotto, Philippe V. Baret, Clémentine Antier
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) carry significant environmental expectations. However, their environmental performance has often been questioned. Existing research has tackled the issue from ecological and economic perspectives. This study aims to provide a complementary governance perspective. It first develops a theoretical framework to analyze AES governance through a multilevel lens, identifying three distinct levels based on different actors' roles: macro (setting policy boundaries), meso (implementation of the policy framework), and micro (farmer actions). Second, this study develops an analytical framework to investigate barriers hindering AES environmental performance and their linkage to AES governance. The combined frameworks have been tested in a regional case study in the Hauts-de-France region. A list of 40 barriers is identified, spanning organizational, power dynamics, and financial issues. Barriers are not confined to farm or policy scale, distributing unevenly across governance levels, with different agencies across roles and actors in unlocking the AES performance.

AMBIOVol. 54(11)
UCLouvain (BE)
Université Catholique de Louvain, European Commission, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Universiteit van Tilburg, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.