Living with the incoherent: Practical insights on implementing European restoration policies for biodiversity policy integration

Policy incoherence is an omnipresent challenge in public administration. Focusing on the joint implementation of the European Water Framework Directive and the Habitats Directive, we analyze how administrative fragmentation hampers river restoration projects at the sub-national level in Germany. By shifting the analytical focus to institutional and administrative factors, we reveal barriers at institutional, processual and individual levels. We find that the failure of river restoration projects stems not only from practical hurdles, such as lack of resources, information, or manpower, but also from more fundamental flaws in the administrative arrangements. Based on a multi-stakeholder consultation, we argue that both bottom-up and top-down approaches can support better coordination and a local mandate for joint implementation. In particular, state-level planning can help reduce local coordination costs in the short term. The analysis highlights the critical role of individual actors and leadership, reframing and cross-sectoral coordination for policy integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02180-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Living with the incoherent: Practical insights on implementing European restoration policies for biodiversity policy integration

Barbara Stammel, Fabian Pröbstl, Yves Zinngrebe, Mathias Scholz et al.
1 citations
AMBIO
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
article

Living with the incoherent: Practical insights on implementing European restoration policies for biodiversity policy integration

Barbara Stammel, Fabian Pröbstl, Yves Zinngrebe, Mathias Scholz, Frank Hüesker, Sophia Schmid, Michael Böcher
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Policy incoherence is an omnipresent challenge in public administration. Focusing on the joint implementation of the European Water Framework Directive and the Habitats Directive, we analyze how administrative fragmentation hampers river restoration projects at the sub-national level in Germany. By shifting the analytical focus to institutional and administrative factors, we reveal barriers at institutional, processual and individual levels. We find that the failure of river restoration projects stems not only from practical hurdles, such as lack of resources, information, or manpower, but also from more fundamental flaws in the administrative arrangements. Based on a multi-stakeholder consultation, we argue that both bottom-up and top-down approaches can support better coordination and a local mandate for joint implementation. In particular, state-level planning can help reduce local coordination costs in the short term. The analysis highlights the critical role of individual actors and leadership, reframing and cross-sectoral coordination for policy integration.

AMBIOVol. 54(10)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (DE), University of Erfurt (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.