Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy

Although immunization during pregnancy can protect mothers and their infants from vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality, vaccination rates are often poor. We systematically reviewed the literature from inception to July 4, 2023, for randomized and non-randomized quasi-experimental studies estimating the effects of interventions to increase vaccination during pregnancy. Of 9331 studies screened, 36 met inclusion criteria, including 18 demand-side interventions, 11 supply-side interventions, and seven multi-level (demand and supply-side) interventions. Demand-side interventions commonly addressed patient education, showing modest improvement (pooled RR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.1%, low certainty). Supply-side interventions commonly implemented Assessment-Feedback-Incentive-eXchange interventions with little improvement (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 94.0%, low certainty). Multi-level interventions were modestly effective in increasing vaccination (pooled RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 97%, very low certainty). Interventions identified in the literature mostly resulted in low to moderate increases in vaccination with likely high heterogeneity and low to very low certainty in the findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Vaccines
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01120-1
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy

Michelle Giles, Annette K. Regan, Eliana Castillo, Brianna Agnew et al.
6 citations
npj Vaccines
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
13.00
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy

Michelle Giles, Annette K. Regan, Eliana Castillo, Brianna Agnew, Alice Fiddian-Green, Stacey L Rowe, Honorine Uwimana, Elizabeth Jitka Olsanska
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Although immunization during pregnancy can protect mothers and their infants from vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality, vaccination rates are often poor. We systematically reviewed the literature from inception to July 4, 2023, for randomized and non-randomized quasi-experimental studies estimating the effects of interventions to increase vaccination during pregnancy. Of 9331 studies screened, 36 met inclusion criteria, including 18 demand-side interventions, 11 supply-side interventions, and seven multi-level (demand and supply-side) interventions. Demand-side interventions commonly addressed patient education, showing modest improvement (pooled RR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.1%, low certainty). Supply-side interventions commonly implemented Assessment-Feedback-Incentive-eXchange interventions with little improvement (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 94.0%, low certainty). Multi-level interventions were modestly effective in increasing vaccination (pooled RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 97%, very low certainty). Interventions identified in the literature mostly resulted in low to moderate increases in vaccination with likely high heterogeneity and low to very low certainty in the findings.

npj VaccinesVol. 10(1)
University of Calgary (CA), Monash University (AU), University of San Francisco (US), California College of the Arts (US)
University of Ottawa, University of San Francisco, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
13.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.