Impact of 52 micro seasons on sustainability

The evolution of the fashion industry from traditional bi-annual seasons to the rapid 52 micro-season model has significantly impacted sustainability. Fast fashion brands continuously push new trends, leading to overproduction, textile waste, and an increased carbon footprint. The predominance of synthetic materials, particularly polyester, amplifies environmental concerns through non-biodegradable waste and microplastic pollution. The socio-economic effects of micro-seasons extend to labor exploitation in developing nations, where garment workers face unsafe working conditions, unfair wages, and the erosion of labor rights. Additionally, the growth of fast fashion has encouraged impulsive buying habits, especially among Gen Z, influenced by social media trends and endorsements from influencers. This trend-driven consumer culture promotes disposable fashion and undermines traditional craftsmanship with cheap, machine-made alternatives. Addressing these challenges requires a shift toward sustainable design, responsible sourcing, and circular business models. Consumer behavior, industry accountability, and policy enforcement play crucial roles in mitigating the negative impacts of micro-seasons. This paper critically examines the impact of micro-seasons on sustainability and explores strategies to foster a more ethical and environmentally responsible fashion industry.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Home Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22271/23957476.2025.v11.i1g.1826
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of 52 micro seasons on sustainability

Sabina L. Shaikh, Nikhila Rane
International Journal of Home Science
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Impact of 52 micro seasons on sustainability

Sabina L. Shaikh, Nikhila Rane
article en

Abstract

The evolution of the fashion industry from traditional bi-annual seasons to the rapid 52 micro-season model has significantly impacted sustainability. Fast fashion brands continuously push new trends, leading to overproduction, textile waste, and an increased carbon footprint. The predominance of synthetic materials, particularly polyester, amplifies environmental concerns through non-biodegradable waste and microplastic pollution. The socio-economic effects of micro-seasons extend to labor exploitation in developing nations, where garment workers face unsafe working conditions, unfair wages, and the erosion of labor rights. Additionally, the growth of fast fashion has encouraged impulsive buying habits, especially among Gen Z, influenced by social media trends and endorsements from influencers. This trend-driven consumer culture promotes disposable fashion and undermines traditional craftsmanship with cheap, machine-made alternatives. Addressing these challenges requires a shift toward sustainable design, responsible sourcing, and circular business models. Consumer behavior, industry accountability, and policy enforcement play crucial roles in mitigating the negative impacts of micro-seasons. This paper critically examines the impact of micro-seasons on sustainability and explores strategies to foster a more ethical and environmentally responsible fashion industry.

International Journal of Home ScienceVol. 11(1)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.