Strategies for passivating microneedle-based sensors: development, characterization and comparison

• To our knowledge, first dedicated paper on passivation methods for microneedles-based biosensor. • Characterization and comparison of different passivation techniques and materials completed. • Base for future work aiming at optimizing sensor passivations for specific applications. Microneedles (MNs) are sharp, pillar-like structures shorter than 1 mm. They can painlessly pierce the stratum corneum (SC), the outermost layer of the skin, and interface with the underlying dermal interstitial fluid, rich in biomarkers. Due to these properties, MNs have been widely investigated for several diagnostic applications. In particular, MN-based biosensors could enable the development of the new generation of minimally invasive continuous monitoring systems. To become a biosensor, the body or the tip of the needles must be functionalized. In addition, the area surrounding the MNs is usually passivated to prevent substrate interferences. Although passivation layers are widely used, there is a lack of characterization of such layers. This work aims at filling this gap, by developing, characterizing, and comparing six different passivation techniques. These include the application of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Epotek 353ND, silicon oxide (SiO 2 ), parylene, varnish and an adhesive film to microneedle arrays. The performance of each method was then assessed using electrochemical measurements, optical and SEM imaging, and contact angle analysis. Significant variability was observed across the various methods and materials. When assessed in terms of the electrochemically active area available after passivation, the tape and parylene were the most promising layers, while varnish and epoxy were the worst performing materials. The PMMA performed better than the other liquid passivations, but still requires refinement due to the high degree of unwanted coverage of the needles. Finally, the SiO 2 layer seemed to be a viable option, but also remains in need of additional optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors and Actuators Reports
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2025.100328
Primary Topic
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for passivating microneedle-based sensors: development, characterization and comparison

Giorgio C. Mutinati, Steffen Kurzhals, Andrea Bocchino, Fiona Barry et al.
3 links
Sensors and Actuators Reports
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
article

Strategies for passivating microneedle-based sensors: development, characterization and comparison

Giorgio C. Mutinati, Steffen Kurzhals, Andrea Bocchino, Fiona Barry, Eva Melnik, Simone Iadanza, Yuan Hu, Paul Galvin, Conor O’Mahony, Sofia Rodrigues Teixeira, Fahima Rahman, Adam Ryan, Chinmay Thatte
article en

Abstract

• To our knowledge, first dedicated paper on passivation methods for microneedles-based biosensor. • Characterization and comparison of different passivation techniques and materials completed. • Base for future work aiming at optimizing sensor passivations for specific applications. Microneedles (MNs) are sharp, pillar-like structures shorter than 1 mm. They can painlessly pierce the stratum corneum (SC), the outermost layer of the skin, and interface with the underlying dermal interstitial fluid, rich in biomarkers. Due to these properties, MNs have been widely investigated for several diagnostic applications. In particular, MN-based biosensors could enable the development of the new generation of minimally invasive continuous monitoring systems. To become a biosensor, the body or the tip of the needles must be functionalized. In addition, the area surrounding the MNs is usually passivated to prevent substrate interferences. Although passivation layers are widely used, there is a lack of characterization of such layers. This work aims at filling this gap, by developing, characterizing, and comparing six different passivation techniques. These include the application of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), Epotek 353ND, silicon oxide (SiO 2 ), parylene, varnish and an adhesive film to microneedle arrays. The performance of each method was then assessed using electrochemical measurements, optical and SEM imaging, and contact angle analysis. Significant variability was observed across the various methods and materials. When assessed in terms of the electrochemically active area available after passivation, the tape and parylene were the most promising layers, while varnish and epoxy were the worst performing materials. The PMMA performed better than the other liquid passivations, but still requires refinement due to the high degree of unwanted coverage of the needles. Finally, the SiO 2 layer seemed to be a viable option, but also remains in need of additional optimization.

Sensors and Actuators ReportsVol. 9
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), University College Cork (IE), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Swiss Polar Institute (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.