Impact of Discussion Sessions on Students’ Learning Outcomes in an Econometrics Class

This paper adds to the literature on supplemental instruction by estimating the impact of attending at least 50% of discussion sessions taught by PhD students on the overall performance of undergraduate students in an introductory econometrics class. Past studies on this topic have mostly analyzed outcomes of students from principles level courses, where supplemental instructors were undergraduate students. There are two main findings in this paper. Firstly, for the overall sample, after controlling for students’ demographic and academic characteristics, attending at least 50% of the sessions has no statistically significant impact on final course scores, although the coefficient is positive. Secondly, scores of academically weaker students (measured by their past academic performance in college) increase by attending more sessions, while scores of academically stronger students go down. Therefore, this paper shows a variation in the effects from supplemental instruction, with weaker students reaping the most benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Economist
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345251335632
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Discussion Sessions on Students’ Learning Outcomes in an Econometrics Class

Ishita Dey
1 citations
The American Economist
Innovations in Educational Methods
8.93
article

Impact of Discussion Sessions on Students’ Learning Outcomes in an Econometrics Class

Ishita Dey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper adds to the literature on supplemental instruction by estimating the impact of attending at least 50% of discussion sessions taught by PhD students on the overall performance of undergraduate students in an introductory econometrics class. Past studies on this topic have mostly analyzed outcomes of students from principles level courses, where supplemental instructors were undergraduate students. There are two main findings in this paper. Firstly, for the overall sample, after controlling for students’ demographic and academic characteristics, attending at least 50% of the sessions has no statistically significant impact on final course scores, although the coefficient is positive. Secondly, scores of academically weaker students (measured by their past academic performance in college) increase by attending more sessions, while scores of academically stronger students go down. Therefore, this paper shows a variation in the effects from supplemental instruction, with weaker students reaping the most benefits.

The American EconomistVol. 71(1)
Boston University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovations in Educational Methods
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Discussion Sessions on Students’ Learning Outcomes in an Econometrics Class — Ishita Dey · The American Economist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS