A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
While each modality has distinct advantages and disadvantages, all 3 card study data collection methods were acceptable to PCCs and obtained a high response rate.
Authors
- Maureen Boardman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-7383)
- Timothy E. Burdick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-5133)
- Constance van Eeghen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-5004)
- Jennifer Raymond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-4105)
- Donald E. Nease (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-3720)
- Elisabeth Wilson
- Charles D. MacLean (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-0899)
- Meagan E. Stabler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-2622)
- John M. Westfall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-0268)
- Neil Korsen
- Paula S Hudon
- Zoe Daudier
- Bruce Jobse
- Laurie Emanuele
Institutions
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240199r1
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.76
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences