How can the illness risk representation framework be used to explain flu, whooping cough and Covid-19 vaccination uptake amongst pregnant women? A qualitative study

To explore how the illness risk representation framework explains vaccination uptake in pregnant women. Pregnant women were recruited via hospitals and community groups. Semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, explored factors influencing vaccination uptake. Findings were analyzed using codebook approach to thematic analysis, and applied to illness risk representation framework (IRR). 43 interviews explored domains of the IRR showing good fit to vaccination beliefs of pregnant women. Identity beliefs focused on feelings of susceptibility to illness, beliefs about Cause related to exposure and prevalence to illness and feelings about immunity, Timeline beliefs included feelings about appropriate times to vaccinate, with some waiting to accept vaccinations. Beliefs about Consequences focused on perceived severity of illness and vaccine novelty, and Control beliefs included effectiveness of vaccinations, adverse effects and attempts to control exposure. Some domains of the IRR fit better than others, with estimates of likelihood and severity contributing to risk appraisals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251329680
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can the illness risk representation framework be used to explain flu, whooping cough and Covid-19 vaccination uptake amongst pregnant women? A qualitative study

Catherine Grimley, Jo Parsons, Sarah Hillman, Louise Clarke
Journal of Health Psychology
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

How can the illness risk representation framework be used to explain flu, whooping cough and Covid-19 vaccination uptake amongst pregnant women? A qualitative study

Catherine Grimley, Jo Parsons, Sarah Hillman, Louise Clarke
article en

Abstract

To explore how the illness risk representation framework explains vaccination uptake in pregnant women. Pregnant women were recruited via hospitals and community groups. Semi-structured interviews with pregnant women, explored factors influencing vaccination uptake. Findings were analyzed using codebook approach to thematic analysis, and applied to illness risk representation framework (IRR). 43 interviews explored domains of the IRR showing good fit to vaccination beliefs of pregnant women. Identity beliefs focused on feelings of susceptibility to illness, beliefs about Cause related to exposure and prevalence to illness and feelings about immunity, Timeline beliefs included feelings about appropriate times to vaccinate, with some waiting to accept vaccinations. Beliefs about Consequences focused on perceived severity of illness and vaccine novelty, and Control beliefs included effectiveness of vaccinations, adverse effects and attempts to control exposure. Some domains of the IRR fit better than others, with estimates of likelihood and severity contributing to risk appraisals.

Journal of Health PsychologyVol. 30(13)
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.