Lead, link, or leverage? An integrative framework to assess different government roles in collaborative governance processes across political systems

Abstract Collaborative governance is an emerging phenomenon through which governments nowadays are seeking to address today's societal challenges. Oftentimes, this requires governments to assume different roles and responsibilities. To unpack this multidimensionality, this study establishes an integrative framework distinguishing between a leading, linking and leveraging role, and accounting for institutional and actor‐level aspects. We clarify the analytical leverage of this framework through a plausibility probe comparing two collaborative processes in Canada and the Netherlands, focused on national climate policy processes. Our findings underscore the value of our framework, shed light on how institutional and political drivers shape collaborative roles of governments across political systems, and their collaborative abilities in the face of politicization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70030
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lead, link, or leverage? An integrative framework to assess different government roles in collaborative governance processes across political systems

Caelesta Braun, Erin A. Sullivan, Bert Fraussen
4 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Public Policy and Administration Research
14.63
article

Lead, link, or leverage? An integrative framework to assess different government roles in collaborative governance processes across political systems

Caelesta Braun, Erin A. Sullivan, Bert Fraussen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Collaborative governance is an emerging phenomenon through which governments nowadays are seeking to address today's societal challenges. Oftentimes, this requires governments to assume different roles and responsibilities. To unpack this multidimensionality, this study establishes an integrative framework distinguishing between a leading, linking and leveraging role, and accounting for institutional and actor‐level aspects. We clarify the analytical leverage of this framework through a plausibility probe comparing two collaborative processes in Canada and the Netherlands, focused on national climate policy processes. Our findings underscore the value of our framework, shed light on how institutional and political drivers shape collaborative roles of governments across political systems, and their collaborative abilities in the face of politicization.

Policy Studies JournalVol. 53(4)
Leiden University (NL), Hague Institute for Global Justice (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Public Policy and Administration Research
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lead, link, or leverage? An integrative framework to assess different government roles in collaborative governance processes across political systems — Caelesta Braun, Erin A. Sullivan, et al. · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS