Reengaging Criminology in Regulation and Governance: A Synergistic Research Agenda on Regulatory Guardianship

ABSTRACT Recent literature calls for scholars to bridge the divide that has emerged between criminology and regulation and governance. In the current work, we propose that criminological opportunity theories provide one fruitful pathway to that end. Specifically, we introduce the notion of regulatory guardianship based on the concepts of guardians, guardian capability, and guardian willingness to intervene, and connect them to the regulation and governance literature. We demonstrate the utility of this perspective as the building blocks for improving theoretical understanding of the effectiveness of a broad range of parties engaged in compliance work in specific regulatory environments. Considering new empirical insights into regulatory guardianship in the design of future legislation and systems of oversight and accountability may also improve governance implementation and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reengaging Criminology in Regulation and Governance: A Synergistic Research Agenda on Regulatory Guardianship

Carole Gibbs, Rachel Boratto, Fiona Chan, Tyler Hug
2 citations
Regulation & Governance
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
4.63
article

Reengaging Criminology in Regulation and Governance: A Synergistic Research Agenda on Regulatory Guardianship

Carole Gibbs, Rachel Boratto, Fiona Chan, Tyler Hug
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent literature calls for scholars to bridge the divide that has emerged between criminology and regulation and governance. In the current work, we propose that criminological opportunity theories provide one fruitful pathway to that end. Specifically, we introduce the notion of regulatory guardianship based on the concepts of guardians, guardian capability, and guardian willingness to intervene, and connect them to the regulation and governance literature. We demonstrate the utility of this perspective as the building blocks for improving theoretical understanding of the effectiveness of a broad range of parties engaged in compliance work in specific regulatory environments. Considering new empirical insights into regulatory guardianship in the design of future legislation and systems of oversight and accountability may also improve governance implementation and effectiveness.

Regulation & Governance
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada (CA), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reengaging Criminology in Regulation and Governance: A Synergistic Research Agenda on Regulatory Guardianship — Carole Gibbs, Rachel Boratto, et al. · Regulation & Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS