Can ChatGPT accurately identify the position of parties? A validation study with an expert survey in France

We evaluate whether ChatGPT can be used to estimate the ideological positions of parties in real time. Compared to other methods, ChatGPT can be used at all times, with minimal cost, no technical skills, and for all parties, including new ones. In a validation exercise, we asked ChatGPT and a group of local experts to simultaneously estimate the positions of French political parties in the context of the 2024 European election on a series of issues from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey. We find that ChatGPT’s estimations are generally close to those of the expert survey, especially for major and salient political issues (left-right, European integration, immigration). However, it provides less accurate estimates on fringe issues (free market, asylum policies, urban–rural interests) and specific party characteristics (within-party division, issue blurring). Thus, ChatGPT shows strong potential as an alternative data source for estimating parties’ positions but should be used with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research & Politics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680251335653
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ChatGPT accurately identify the position of parties? A validation study with an expert survey in France

Damien Bol, Pierre-Henri Bono
3 citations
Research & Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
25.57
article

Can ChatGPT accurately identify the position of parties? A validation study with an expert survey in France

Damien Bol, Pierre-Henri Bono
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We evaluate whether ChatGPT can be used to estimate the ideological positions of parties in real time. Compared to other methods, ChatGPT can be used at all times, with minimal cost, no technical skills, and for all parties, including new ones. In a validation exercise, we asked ChatGPT and a group of local experts to simultaneously estimate the positions of French political parties in the context of the 2024 European election on a series of issues from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey. We find that ChatGPT’s estimations are generally close to those of the expert survey, especially for major and salient political issues (left-right, European integration, immigration). However, it provides less accurate estimates on fringe issues (free market, asylum policies, urban–rural interests) and specific party characteristics (within-party division, issue blurring). Thus, ChatGPT shows strong potential as an alternative data source for estimating parties’ positions but should be used with caution.

Research & PoliticsVol. 12(2)
Centre de Recherches Politiques de Sciences Po (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can ChatGPT accurately identify the position of parties? A validation study with an expert survey in France — Damien Bol, Pierre-Henri Bono · Research & Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS