Upper Digestive Hemorrhage: Clinical, Endoscopic and Evolutionary Particularities between Older and Younger Patients, Prospective Study

Upper GI bleeding is the most common reason for emergency hospitalization in hepato-gastroenterology. However, there are not enough studies comparing clinical and endoscopic features between young and elderly patients. The aim of our study is to compare the epidemiological, clinical, endoscopic, therapeutic and prognostic features of UGI in young vs. elderly subjects. Method: This is a single center prospective cross-sectional study about 332 patients, conducted over a one-year period. We divided our patients into 2 groups, group A corresponding to subjects aged ≥ 65 years and group B corresponding to patients < 65 years. Results: Among the 332 FOGD performed for HDH, 38.9% were older than 65 years. The sex ratio M/F was 2.79. 31.8% of patients were on antithrombotic therapy, and 38.8% had comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups A and B regarding the origin of HDH, however, it was found that there was a difference between the two groups A and B regarding the use of antithrombotic drugs (31,8%vs.10.8%, p<0.001) the presence of comorbidities (39.1%vs.20.7% p<0.001) the presence of active bleeding (9.3%vs.18.7%, p=0.019) and the use of endoscopic hemostasis (8.5%vs.17.7%, p= 0.019). In multivariate analysis and adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, presence of active bleeding and use of antithrombotic drugs, only the presence of active bleeding could predict the need for endoscopic hemostasis. In fact, the presence of active bleeding increased the likelihood of needing endoscopic hemostasis by 29.63-fold (p<0.001), whereas the use of antithrombotics (p=0.37) and age ≥ 65 years (p=0. 21) did not influence this risk. Conclusion: Although older subjects had more comorbidities, more use of antithrombotics, HDH in this age group does not appear to be more severe with a lower rate of active bleeding at endoscopy implying a less frequent need for endoscopic hemostasis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Journal of Medical Case Reports
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36347/sjmcr.2025.v13i04.015
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upper Digestive Hemorrhage: Clinical, Endoscopic and Evolutionary Particularities between Older and Younger Patients, Prospective Study

Sanaa Berrag, Rachid Laaroussi, Tarik Adioui, Mouna Tamzaourte et al.
Scholars Journal of Medical Case Reports
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Upper Digestive Hemorrhage: Clinical, Endoscopic and Evolutionary Particularities between Older and Younger Patients, Prospective Study

Sanaa Berrag, Rachid Laaroussi, Tarik Adioui, Mouna Tamzaourte, Fouad Nejjari, Abdelfettah Touibi, I. Mouslim, S Hdiye, C Jioua
article en

Abstract

Upper GI bleeding is the most common reason for emergency hospitalization in hepato-gastroenterology. However, there are not enough studies comparing clinical and endoscopic features between young and elderly patients. The aim of our study is to compare the epidemiological, clinical, endoscopic, therapeutic and prognostic features of UGI in young vs. elderly subjects. Method: This is a single center prospective cross-sectional study about 332 patients, conducted over a one-year period. We divided our patients into 2 groups, group A corresponding to subjects aged ≥ 65 years and group B corresponding to patients < 65 years. Results: Among the 332 FOGD performed for HDH, 38.9% were older than 65 years. The sex ratio M/F was 2.79. 31.8% of patients were on antithrombotic therapy, and 38.8% had comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups A and B regarding the origin of HDH, however, it was found that there was a difference between the two groups A and B regarding the use of antithrombotic drugs (31,8%vs.10.8%, p<0.001) the presence of comorbidities (39.1%vs.20.7% p<0.001) the presence of active bleeding (9.3%vs.18.7%, p=0.019) and the use of endoscopic hemostasis (8.5%vs.17.7%, p= 0.019). In multivariate analysis and adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, presence of active bleeding and use of antithrombotic drugs, only the presence of active bleeding could predict the need for endoscopic hemostasis. In fact, the presence of active bleeding increased the likelihood of needing endoscopic hemostasis by 29.63-fold (p<0.001), whereas the use of antithrombotics (p=0.37) and age ≥ 65 years (p=0. 21) did not influence this risk. Conclusion: Although older subjects had more comorbidities, more use of antithrombotics, HDH in this age group does not appear to be more severe with a lower rate of active bleeding at endoscopy implying a less frequent need for endoscopic hemostasis.

Scholars Journal of Medical Case ReportsVol. 13(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upper Digestive Hemorrhage: Clinical, Endoscopic and Evolutionary Particularities between Older and Younger Patients, Prospective Study — Sanaa Berrag, Rachid Laaroussi, et al. · Scholars Journal of Medical Case Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS