CIVIL CLAIM IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING ESSENCE

The article is devoted to the issue of compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense by filing a civil claim in criminal proceedings, which is relevant for modern science of criminal procedure. The author draws attention to the fact that fundamental changes in the current criminal procedural and civil legislation necessitate a revision of established approaches not only to the procedural procedure for filing and considering a civil claim in criminal proceedings, but to doctrinal approaches to understanding the essence of the institution of a civil claim, because a typical mistake in scientific research is the use of established legal “clichés” in understanding modern institutions, including the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings. Thus, the purpose of the article is to understand the essence of the conceptual changes that have occurred in the regulatory regulation of the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings, as a fundamental concept of the doctrinal understanding of the form of considering a civil claim. The author’s approaches are based on general and special methods of scientific research. The logical method was used to examine the concept of “joint process”; the systemic method was used to understand the problem in its comprehensive vision and to form conclusions; the hermeneutic method was useful for interpreting the norms of criminal procedural law. According to the results of the study, a conclusion was made about the inexpediency of understanding a civil claim in criminal proceedings as a joint process, since it cannot be considered as a combination of criminal proceedings and proceedings regarding a civil claim in one proceeding. The procedure for compensation for damage on the basis of a declared civil claim operates within the framework of criminal procedural legal relations, the norms of civil procedural law are auxiliary, as indicated by Part 5 of Article 128 of Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, and therefore it is a single process devoid of contradictions between the two branches of law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.10.2024.15
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CIVIL CLAIM IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING ESSENCE

Stanislav Moseiko
Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

CIVIL CLAIM IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING ESSENCE

Stanislav Moseiko
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense by filing a civil claim in criminal proceedings, which is relevant for modern science of criminal procedure. The author draws attention to the fact that fundamental changes in the current criminal procedural and civil legislation necessitate a revision of established approaches not only to the procedural procedure for filing and considering a civil claim in criminal proceedings, but to doctrinal approaches to understanding the essence of the institution of a civil claim, because a typical mistake in scientific research is the use of established legal “clichés” in understanding modern institutions, including the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings. Thus, the purpose of the article is to understand the essence of the conceptual changes that have occurred in the regulatory regulation of the institution of a civil claim in criminal proceedings, as a fundamental concept of the doctrinal understanding of the form of considering a civil claim. The author’s approaches are based on general and special methods of scientific research. The logical method was used to examine the concept of “joint process”; the systemic method was used to understand the problem in its comprehensive vision and to form conclusions; the hermeneutic method was useful for interpreting the norms of criminal procedural law. According to the results of the study, a conclusion was made about the inexpediency of understanding a civil claim in criminal proceedings as a joint process, since it cannot be considered as a combination of criminal proceedings and proceedings regarding a civil claim in one proceeding. The procedure for compensation for damage on the basis of a declared civil claim operates within the framework of criminal procedural legal relations, the norms of civil procedural law are auxiliary, as indicated by Part 5 of Article 128 of Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, and therefore it is a single process devoid of contradictions between the two branches of law.

Archives of Criminology and Forensic SciencesVol. 10(2)
IQ Samhällsbyggnad (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CIVIL CLAIM IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO UNDERSTANDING ESSENCE — Stanislav Moseiko · Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS