CLASSIFICATION OF FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS IN THE READING SUBJECT BASED ON BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: APPLIED IN AL-RAYA UNIVERSITY

This study analyzes final exam questions for a reading course using Bloom's Taxonomy to evaluate their alignment with cognitive learning objectives. A descriptive-analytical approach was employed, with data collected from exam questions at Al-Raya University Institute and supplemented by literature and online sources. Findings reveal an emphasis on understanding (36 questions, 43 points) and application (17 questions, 24 points), demonstrating strong comprehension and practical skills. However, lower scores in analysis (9 questions, 11 points), evaluation (1 question, 1 point), and creation (5 questions, 17 points) highlight challenges in higher-order thinking. The results suggest the need for more balanced assessments to foster comprehensive cognitive development, providing valuable insights for improving evaluation strategies in reading education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Abjadia International Journal of Education
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v10i1.31694
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLASSIFICATION OF FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS IN THE READING SUBJECT BASED ON BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: APPLIED IN AL-RAYA UNIVERSITY

Zeid B. Smeer, Reinizqy Mughniza Makmur, Sulaiman Hassan Sulaiman El Warfali
Abjadia International Journal of Education
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

CLASSIFICATION OF FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS IN THE READING SUBJECT BASED ON BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: APPLIED IN AL-RAYA UNIVERSITY

Zeid B. Smeer, Reinizqy Mughniza Makmur, Sulaiman Hassan Sulaiman El Warfali
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes final exam questions for a reading course using Bloom's Taxonomy to evaluate their alignment with cognitive learning objectives. A descriptive-analytical approach was employed, with data collected from exam questions at Al-Raya University Institute and supplemented by literature and online sources. Findings reveal an emphasis on understanding (36 questions, 43 points) and application (17 questions, 24 points), demonstrating strong comprehension and practical skills. However, lower scores in analysis (9 questions, 11 points), evaluation (1 question, 1 point), and creation (5 questions, 17 points) highlight challenges in higher-order thinking. The results suggest the need for more balanced assessments to foster comprehensive cognitive development, providing valuable insights for improving evaluation strategies in reading education.

Abjadia International Journal of EducationVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.