AI ethics: Contextual frameworks and domain-specific concerns

The widespread deployment of AI systems has led to overlapping concerns around technological impact and governance, often resulting in conceptual ambiguities and policy confusion. We propose a structured and context-sensitive framework for addressing the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. We argue that ethical frameworks must distinguish between the intended domain of AI deployment and the scale of its societal effects.To resolve these tensions, we introduce a two-dimensional matrix based on (1) the extent of AI’s impact and (2) the scope of its governance, which together form four distinct ethical contexts. Within each quadrant, we explore specific risks, values, and regulatory considerations. This matrix not only clarifies the conceptual terrain of AI ethics but also offers a practical roadmap for anticipating ethical risks, developing normative guidance, and informing domain-specific governance strategies.Our goal is not to prescribe a single ethical doctrine but to provide decision-makers with a structured lens through which AI systems can be evaluated in context. This approach promotes adaptive and anticipatory governance while remaining responsive to local, institutional, and cultural variations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v7i1.1224
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI ethics: Contextual frameworks and domain-specific concerns

Benjamin Duraković, L. Lee, Sencer Yeralan
1 citations
Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

AI ethics: Contextual frameworks and domain-specific concerns

Benjamin Duraković, L. Lee, Sencer Yeralan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The widespread deployment of AI systems has led to overlapping concerns around technological impact and governance, often resulting in conceptual ambiguities and policy confusion. We propose a structured and context-sensitive framework for addressing the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. We argue that ethical frameworks must distinguish between the intended domain of AI deployment and the scale of its societal effects.To resolve these tensions, we introduce a two-dimensional matrix based on (1) the extent of AI’s impact and (2) the scope of its governance, which together form four distinct ethical contexts. Within each quadrant, we explore specific risks, values, and regulatory considerations. This matrix not only clarifies the conceptual terrain of AI ethics but also offers a practical roadmap for anticipating ethical risks, developing normative guidance, and informing domain-specific governance strategies.Our goal is not to prescribe a single ethical doctrine but to provide decision-makers with a structured lens through which AI systems can be evaluated in context. This approach promotes adaptive and anticipatory governance while remaining responsive to local, institutional, and cultural variations.

Heritage and Sustainable Development ISSN 2712-0554Vol. 7(1)
Universidade Paulista (BR), U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.