Evaluation of nonspecific reactivity rates across three immunohematology testing platforms with assessment of subsequent specific alloantibody development
Nonspecific reactions differ by platforms in specificity and strength. Solid-phase shows stronger reactivity, while automated gel has higher rates of positivity.
Authors
- Nalan Yurtsever (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-6046)
- Matthew Z. Madden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-4427)
- Christopher A. Tormey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-2245)
- Bhushan Shah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-3448)
- Edward S. Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1723-4463)
- Gordon Carmichael (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-6580)
- Ryan J. Malonis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-3180)
- M. Ahmed
- Laurie Bizzario
- Numan Isik
Institutions
- Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
- Yale University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Transfusion
- Published
- 2025-04-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18256
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Blood groups and transfusion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.77
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute