The dynamics of cave roost use by bats in the central Himalayas of Nepal: implications for conservation

Abstract The seasonal use of caves by bats can be attributed to physiologically demanding activities like mating and reproduction in spring and torpor in winter. Cave use, however, varies within and across species and can depend on the physical and microclimatic conditions of the caves. Understanding the current patterns and predictors of cave use is therefore crucial to develop a reference for assessing the response of bats to future changes in climatic conditions. We quantified the diversity and abundance of bats in 41 caves that varied in structure and temperature across a seasonal (mid‐winter, late‐winter and early‐spring) and an elevational (400–2700 m above sea level) gradient in the central Himalayas. Richness and abundance of bat species exhibited seasonal variation, with more species and individuals present in caves during early‐spring ( n = 15) compared to mid‐winter ( n = 9). Species richness declined linearly with elevation in mid‐winter but remained relatively similar until 900 msl and then declined in late‐winter and early‐spring. Species such as Hipposideros armiger (20.14 ± 1.60°C in spring and 17.97 ± 0.88°C in mid‐winter), Rhinolophus affinis (19.98 ± 1.76°C in spring and 16.18 ± 3.09°C in mid‐winter) and Rhinolophus cf. pusillus (19.55 ± 1.64°C in spring and 15.43 ± 2.87°C in mid‐winter) preferred warmer microclimates within caves during early‐spring compared to mid‐winter. The season‐ and species‐specific cave use that we report here suggests that even minor fluctuations in cave temperatures could potentially alter the composition of bat communities inside caves. Prioritization assessment based on a bat cave vulnerability index indicates that different caves must be protected based on their specific usage patterns and the abundance of species they support at various times. Overall, we highlight the importance of studying cave‐dwelling bats in climate‐vulnerable areas such as the Himalayas where species richness is high to help understand and predict the responses of animals to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Zoology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.70018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dynamics of cave roost use by bats in the central Himalayas of Nepal: implications for conservation

Vasanthi Ramachandran, Maria Thaker, Kripa Neupane, Sanjeev Baniya et al.
2 citations
Journal of Zoology
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
6.05
article

The dynamics of cave roost use by bats in the central Himalayas of Nepal: implications for conservation

Vasanthi Ramachandran, Maria Thaker, Kripa Neupane, Sanjeev Baniya, Varun R. Goswami
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The seasonal use of caves by bats can be attributed to physiologically demanding activities like mating and reproduction in spring and torpor in winter. Cave use, however, varies within and across species and can depend on the physical and microclimatic conditions of the caves. Understanding the current patterns and predictors of cave use is therefore crucial to develop a reference for assessing the response of bats to future changes in climatic conditions. We quantified the diversity and abundance of bats in 41 caves that varied in structure and temperature across a seasonal (mid‐winter, late‐winter and early‐spring) and an elevational (400–2700 m above sea level) gradient in the central Himalayas. Richness and abundance of bat species exhibited seasonal variation, with more species and individuals present in caves during early‐spring ( n = 15) compared to mid‐winter ( n = 9). Species richness declined linearly with elevation in mid‐winter but remained relatively similar until 900 msl and then declined in late‐winter and early‐spring. Species such as Hipposideros armiger (20.14 ± 1.60°C in spring and 17.97 ± 0.88°C in mid‐winter), Rhinolophus affinis (19.98 ± 1.76°C in spring and 16.18 ± 3.09°C in mid‐winter) and Rhinolophus cf. pusillus (19.55 ± 1.64°C in spring and 15.43 ± 2.87°C in mid‐winter) preferred warmer microclimates within caves during early‐spring compared to mid‐winter. The season‐ and species‐specific cave use that we report here suggests that even minor fluctuations in cave temperatures could potentially alter the composition of bat communities inside caves. Prioritization assessment based on a bat cave vulnerability index indicates that different caves must be protected based on their specific usage patterns and the abundance of species they support at various times. Overall, we highlight the importance of studying cave‐dwelling bats in climate‐vulnerable areas such as the Himalayas where species richness is high to help understand and predict the responses of animals to climate change.

Journal of ZoologyVol. 326(4)
National Centre for Biological Sciences (IN), University of Florence (IT), Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN), University of New England (AU)
Bat Conservation International, Rufford Foundation, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.