Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are traditionally managed with standard-of-care dressings, compression and appropriate adjunctive venous interventions for pathologic venous reflux. Due to pathophysiological complexity and underlying patient comorbidities, conducting randomised controlled trials to evaluate the comparative efficacy of advanced treatment modalities is difficult, as many patients would likely be excluded. This retrospective, pragmatic, real-world evidence (RWE) study compared the healing outcomes of VLUs treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 312) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 239) in outpatient wound care centres. Unlike restrictive randomised controlled trials, minimal inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create two treatment cohorts that reflected the general VLU population. The incidence (%) of closure was greater in OFM-treated VLUs at 12, 24 and 36 weeks, and this difference was significant at 24 and 36 weeks compared to collagen/ORC. Median time to wound closure was significantly faster (p = 0.045) in the OFM cohort (11.1 ± 0.6 weeks) compared to the collagen/ORC group (12.3 ± 1.0 weeks). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that OFM-treated VLUs had a significantly greater probability of healing (up to ~40%). This RWE comparative efficacy study further substantiates the clinical benefit of OFM in the treatment of chronic wounds, such as VLU, in a real-world patient cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70368
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study

Brandon A. Bosque, Barnaby C. H. May, M. Mark Melin, Abigail E. Chaffin et al.
6 citations
International Wound Journal
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
12.04
article

Clinical Efficacy of Ovine Forestomach Matrix and Collagen/Oxidised Regenerated Cellulose for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Retrospective Comparative Real‐World Evidence Study

Brandon A. Bosque, Barnaby C. H. May, M. Mark Melin, Abigail E. Chaffin, Gregory Bohn, Sandi G. Dempsey, D. Adam Young, Christopher Frampton, Rebecca Aburn
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are traditionally managed with standard-of-care dressings, compression and appropriate adjunctive venous interventions for pathologic venous reflux. Due to pathophysiological complexity and underlying patient comorbidities, conducting randomised controlled trials to evaluate the comparative efficacy of advanced treatment modalities is difficult, as many patients would likely be excluded. This retrospective, pragmatic, real-world evidence (RWE) study compared the healing outcomes of VLUs treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 312) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 239) in outpatient wound care centres. Unlike restrictive randomised controlled trials, minimal inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create two treatment cohorts that reflected the general VLU population. The incidence (%) of closure was greater in OFM-treated VLUs at 12, 24 and 36 weeks, and this difference was significant at 24 and 36 weeks compared to collagen/ORC. Median time to wound closure was significantly faster (p = 0.045) in the OFM cohort (11.1 ± 0.6 weeks) compared to the collagen/ORC group (12.3 ± 1.0 weeks). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that OFM-treated VLUs had a significantly greater probability of healing (up to ~40%). This RWE comparative efficacy study further substantiates the clinical benefit of OFM in the treatment of chronic wounds, such as VLU, in a real-world patient cohort.

International Wound JournalVol. 22(4)
Tulane University (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Wound Healing Society (US), Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (New Zealand) (NZ), Healing Institute (US), University of Otago (NZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
12.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.