Chinese Development Finance and African Policy Space: Towards Productive Incoherence?

ABSTRACT How does Chinese Development Finance influence perceptions of policy space across Sub‐Saharan Africa? This paper employs Grabel's concept of ‘productive incoherence’ to both describe the ‘new development finance landscape’ and to explore its implications for recipient‐country policy space. Drawing on an exploratory survey of elite perceptions and three country case studies (Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique), we find that Chinese Development Finance contributes to incremental and context‐specific enhancements in policy space, rather than transformative or wholesale change. Moreover, we contend that the extent of policy space is determined more‐so by the internal dynamics, historical legacies and structural position of recipient countries within the global political economy, and the interplay between these elements, than by changes in the external financing environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3996
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese Development Finance and African Policy Space: Towards Productive Incoherence?

Jack Taggart, Marcus Power, Han Cheng
Journal of International Development
International Development and Aid
article

Chinese Development Finance and African Policy Space: Towards Productive Incoherence?

Jack Taggart, Marcus Power, Han Cheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT How does Chinese Development Finance influence perceptions of policy space across Sub‐Saharan Africa? This paper employs Grabel's concept of ‘productive incoherence’ to both describe the ‘new development finance landscape’ and to explore its implications for recipient‐country policy space. Drawing on an exploratory survey of elite perceptions and three country case studies (Ethiopia, Malawi and Mozambique), we find that Chinese Development Finance contributes to incremental and context‐specific enhancements in policy space, rather than transformative or wholesale change. Moreover, we contend that the extent of policy space is determined more‐so by the internal dynamics, historical legacies and structural position of recipient countries within the global political economy, and the interplay between these elements, than by changes in the external financing environment.

Journal of International DevelopmentVol. 37(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Durham University (GB), Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (DE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.