A Dynamic Assessment Methodology for Accident Occurrence Probabilities of Gas Distribution Station

Gas distribution stations (GDSs), pivotal nodes in long-distance natural gas transportation networks, are susceptible to catastrophic fire and explosion accidents stemming from system failures, thereby emphasizing the urgency for robust safety measures. While previous studies have mainly focused on gas transmission pipelines, GDSs have received less attention, and existing risk assessment methodologies for GDSs may have limitations in providing accurate and reliable accident probability predictions and fault diagnoses, especially under data uncertainty. This paper introduces a novel dynamic accident probability assessment framework tailored for GDS under data uncertainty. By integrating Bayesian network (BN) modeling with fuzzy expert judgments, frequentist estimation, and Bayesian updating, the framework offers a comprehensive approach. It encompasses accident modeling, root event (RE) probability estimation, undesired event (UE) predictive analysis, probability adaptation, and accident diagnosis analysis. A case study demonstrates the framework’s reliability and effectiveness, revealing that the occurrence probability of major hazards like vapor cloud explosions and long-duration jet fires diminishes significantly with effective safety barriers. Crucially, the framework acknowledges the dynamic nature of risk by incorporating observed failure incidents or near-misses into the assessment, promptly adjusting risk indicators like UE probabilities and RE criticality. This underscores the importance for decision-makers to maintain a heightened awareness of these dynamics, enabling swift adjustments to maintenance strategies and resource allocation prioritization. By mitigating assessment uncertainty and enhancing precision in maintenance strategies, the framework represents a significant advancement in GDS safety management, ultimately striving to elevate safety and reliability standards, mitigate natural gas distribution risks, and safeguard public safety and the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084464
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Dynamic Assessment Methodology for Accident Occurrence Probabilities of Gas Distribution Station

Huirong Huang, Daqing Wang, Bin Wang, Ping Liang et al.
Applied Sciences
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

A Dynamic Assessment Methodology for Accident Occurrence Probabilities of Gas Distribution Station

Huirong Huang, Daqing Wang, Bin Wang, Ping Liang, Shupeng Tian, Weichao Yu
article en

Abstract

Gas distribution stations (GDSs), pivotal nodes in long-distance natural gas transportation networks, are susceptible to catastrophic fire and explosion accidents stemming from system failures, thereby emphasizing the urgency for robust safety measures. While previous studies have mainly focused on gas transmission pipelines, GDSs have received less attention, and existing risk assessment methodologies for GDSs may have limitations in providing accurate and reliable accident probability predictions and fault diagnoses, especially under data uncertainty. This paper introduces a novel dynamic accident probability assessment framework tailored for GDS under data uncertainty. By integrating Bayesian network (BN) modeling with fuzzy expert judgments, frequentist estimation, and Bayesian updating, the framework offers a comprehensive approach. It encompasses accident modeling, root event (RE) probability estimation, undesired event (UE) predictive analysis, probability adaptation, and accident diagnosis analysis. A case study demonstrates the framework’s reliability and effectiveness, revealing that the occurrence probability of major hazards like vapor cloud explosions and long-duration jet fires diminishes significantly with effective safety barriers. Crucially, the framework acknowledges the dynamic nature of risk by incorporating observed failure incidents or near-misses into the assessment, promptly adjusting risk indicators like UE probabilities and RE criticality. This underscores the importance for decision-makers to maintain a heightened awareness of these dynamics, enabling swift adjustments to maintenance strategies and resource allocation prioritization. By mitigating assessment uncertainty and enhancing precision in maintenance strategies, the framework represents a significant advancement in GDS safety management, ultimately striving to elevate safety and reliability standards, mitigate natural gas distribution risks, and safeguard public safety and the environment.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(8)
Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Fujian Petrochemical Group (China) (CN)
Chongqing University, Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Chongqing University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.