The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and early detection remains a significant challenge. Screening the general population is not feasible, but the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced new possibilities for improving early diagnosis and patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE using MeSH terms “Artificial intelligence or AI”, and “diagnosis” and “pancreatic carcinoma or pancreatic adenocarcinoma”. Prisma guidelines were adhered to, and a total of 47 studies resulted, 10 articles were duplicates, 11 articles were excluded as they did not align with the topic, 7 articles could not be retrieved, 13 articles were excluded as they did not fit the criteria, 6 retrospective studies are included in this study. The inclusion criteria for this study are AI being used in the diagnosis, only in pancreatic cancer, within the last 5 years, only in English, and only retrospective studies were included. Results: One study used Digital Imaging Processing (DIP) for analyzing Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images from 153 pancreatic cancer patients, yielding a sensitivity of 97.98% and a specificity of 94.32%. Two studies explored Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) models applied to PET/CT and EUS images, achieving a sensitivity of 95.23% and specificity of 97.51% in PET/CT scans and 83.3% and 93.3% in EUS images, respectively. Another study used a Faster R-CNN model to analyze CT images from 338 pancreatic cancer patients showed high diagnostic accuracy in much less time. Additionally, two studies utilized Natural Language Processing (NLP) for identifying family histories of pancreatic cancer and detecting pancreatic cysts, with the latter achieving sensitivity and specificity rates of 99.9% and 98.8%. Conclusions: The current strategies for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer focus on serum biomarkers and EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA). Sensitivity varies and depends on the physician’s expertise. AI is showing promise in improving pancreatic cancer diagnosis by enhancing early detection and accuracy. Techniques like deep learning, NLP-based models, Faster R-CNN, and CAD systems analyze medical data and images more effectively than manual methods. AI holds the potential to shape the future of pancreatic cancer diagnosis and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2025.154015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Haseeb Tareen, Jahnavi Ethakota, Devin Birsingh Malik, Bipneet Singh et al.
1 citations
Open Journal of Gastroenterology
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Haseeb Tareen, Jahnavi Ethakota, Devin Birsingh Malik, Bipneet Singh, Sakshi Bai, Danesh Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and early detection remains a significant challenge. Screening the general population is not feasible, but the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced new possibilities for improving early diagnosis and patient outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE using MeSH terms “Artificial intelligence or AI”, and “diagnosis” and “pancreatic carcinoma or pancreatic adenocarcinoma”. Prisma guidelines were adhered to, and a total of 47 studies resulted, 10 articles were duplicates, 11 articles were excluded as they did not align with the topic, 7 articles could not be retrieved, 13 articles were excluded as they did not fit the criteria, 6 retrospective studies are included in this study. The inclusion criteria for this study are AI being used in the diagnosis, only in pancreatic cancer, within the last 5 years, only in English, and only retrospective studies were included. Results: One study used Digital Imaging Processing (DIP) for analyzing Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images from 153 pancreatic cancer patients, yielding a sensitivity of 97.98% and a specificity of 94.32%. Two studies explored Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) models applied to PET/CT and EUS images, achieving a sensitivity of 95.23% and specificity of 97.51% in PET/CT scans and 83.3% and 93.3% in EUS images, respectively. Another study used a Faster R-CNN model to analyze CT images from 338 pancreatic cancer patients showed high diagnostic accuracy in much less time. Additionally, two studies utilized Natural Language Processing (NLP) for identifying family histories of pancreatic cancer and detecting pancreatic cysts, with the latter achieving sensitivity and specificity rates of 99.9% and 98.8%. Conclusions: The current strategies for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer focus on serum biomarkers and EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA). Sensitivity varies and depends on the physician’s expertise. AI is showing promise in improving pancreatic cancer diagnosis by enhancing early detection and accuracy. Techniques like deep learning, NLP-based models, Faster R-CNN, and CAD systems analyze medical data and images more effectively than manual methods. AI holds the potential to shape the future of pancreatic cancer diagnosis and improve patient outcomes.

Open Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 15(04)
Henry Ford Allegiance Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.