Evaluating the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Innovate Feedback Processes

Feedback is an essential component of the teaching–learning process; however, it can vary in quality due to different contexts and students’ and professors’ individual characteristics. This research explores the effect of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in strengthening personalized and timely feedback by initially defining an adaptable framework to integrate GenAI into feedback mechanisms defined in theoretical frameworks. We applied a between-subjects analysis in an experimental research design with 263 undergraduate students across multiple disciplines based on an approach consisting of a pretest–post-test process and control and focus groups to evaluate students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-enhanced feedback versus traditional professor-led feedback. The results show that students who used GenAI declared statistically significantly higher satisfaction levels and a greater sense of ownership in the feedback process. Additionally, GenAI scaffolded continuous improvement and active student participation through a structured and accessible feedback environment, determining that 97% of students are willing to reuse the tool. These findings show that GenAI is a valuable tool to complement professors in the creation of an integrated feedback model. This study draws directions on future research on the combination of artificial intelligence and innovative strategies to produce a long-term impact on education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040505
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Innovate Feedback Processes

Mariana E. Elizondo-García, Gilberto Huesca, Claudia H. Aguayo-Hernández, Ricardo Aguayo-González et al.
6 citations
Education Sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
53.56
article

Evaluating the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Innovate Feedback Processes

Mariana E. Elizondo-García, Gilberto Huesca, Claudia H. Aguayo-Hernández, Ricardo Aguayo-González, Tanya González-Buenrostro, Yuridia A. Verdugo-Jasso
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Feedback is an essential component of the teaching–learning process; however, it can vary in quality due to different contexts and students’ and professors’ individual characteristics. This research explores the effect of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in strengthening personalized and timely feedback by initially defining an adaptable framework to integrate GenAI into feedback mechanisms defined in theoretical frameworks. We applied a between-subjects analysis in an experimental research design with 263 undergraduate students across multiple disciplines based on an approach consisting of a pretest–post-test process and control and focus groups to evaluate students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-enhanced feedback versus traditional professor-led feedback. The results show that students who used GenAI declared statistically significantly higher satisfaction levels and a greater sense of ownership in the feedback process. Additionally, GenAI scaffolded continuous improvement and active student participation through a structured and accessible feedback environment, determining that 97% of students are willing to reuse the tool. These findings show that GenAI is a valuable tool to complement professors in the creation of an integrated feedback model. This study draws directions on future research on the combination of artificial intelligence and innovative strategies to produce a long-term impact on education.

Education SciencesVol. 15(4)
Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Student Assessment and Feedback
53.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.