Assessment of risk for pre‐eclampsia at mid‐gestation to define subsequent care

All women should be offered assessment of risk for PE at 11-13 weeks, to help identify those requiring aspirin prophylaxis to reduce the rate of preterm PE, and at 35-37 weeks, to determine the optimal timing of birth to reduce the rate of term PE. Assessment of risk for PE at mid-gestation can be used to identify the subgroups that require additional monitoring at 24-35, 28-35 and 32-35 weeks' gestation. The best performance of screening, reflected in the SPR necessary to achieve a high detection rate, is achieved by a combination of maternal risk factors, MAP and UtA-PI. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29222
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of risk for pre‐eclampsia at mid‐gestation to define subsequent care

Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros H. Nicolaides, Ranjit Akolekar, S. Adjahou et al.
3 citations
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
6.17
article

Assessment of risk for pre‐eclampsia at mid‐gestation to define subsequent care

Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros H. Nicolaides, Ranjit Akolekar, S. Adjahou, A. Wright, Vasileios Logdanidis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

All women should be offered assessment of risk for PE at 11-13 weeks, to help identify those requiring aspirin prophylaxis to reduce the rate of preterm PE, and at 35-37 weeks, to determine the optimal timing of birth to reduce the rate of term PE. Assessment of risk for PE at mid-gestation can be used to identify the subgroups that require additional monitoring at 24-35, 28-35 and 32-35 weeks' gestation. The best performance of screening, reflected in the SPR necessary to achieve a high detection rate, is achieved by a combination of maternal risk factors, MAP and UtA-PI. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 65(6)
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Medway Maritime Hospital (GB), King's College Hospital (GB)
Fetal Medicine Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
6.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of risk for pre‐eclampsia at mid‐gestation to define subsequent care — Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros H. Nicolaides, et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS