Między ochroną a autonomią dziecka – rodzice o kontroli rodzicielskiej na forach internetowych

Due to the potential risks associated with children’s use of the Internet, it is necessary for parents to monitor their children’s online activities. This article presents the issue of parental mediation and the results of original research on parents’ understanding of parental control. The research material consisted of posts on thematic websites. The reconstruction of these posts revealed that parents understand control within five categories: as a response to contemporary times (responsiveness), a standard tool of upbringing (routine), a parent’s concern for the child (responsibility), an attribute of parental authority (domination), and an unnecessary artifact (nonsense). Parents’ statements reveal dilemmas regarding the use of various tools to monitor children’s activities, mainly of an ethical nature, and concerning family relationships. Parents who use monitoring tools remain in a dilemma between protecting the child and respecting their autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2024.59.04
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Między ochroną a autonomią dziecka – rodzice o kontroli rodzicielskiej na forach internetowych

Marzenna Nowicka
Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji
Polish Law and Legal System
article

Między ochroną a autonomią dziecka – rodzice o kontroli rodzicielskiej na forach internetowych

Marzenna Nowicka
article en

Abstract

Due to the potential risks associated with children’s use of the Internet, it is necessary for parents to monitor their children’s online activities. This article presents the issue of parental mediation and the results of original research on parents’ understanding of parental control. The research material consisted of posts on thematic websites. The reconstruction of these posts revealed that parents understand control within five categories: as a response to contemporary times (responsiveness), a standard tool of upbringing (routine), a parent’s concern for the child (responsibility), an attribute of parental authority (domination), and an unnecessary artifact (nonsense). Parents’ statements reveal dilemmas regarding the use of various tools to monitor children’s activities, mainly of an ethical nature, and concerning family relationships. Parents who use monitoring tools remain in a dilemma between protecting the child and respecting their autonomy.

Problemy Wczesnej EdukacjiVol. 59(2)
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Olsztynie (PL), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Między ochroną a autonomią dziecka – rodzice o kontroli rodzicielskiej na forach internetowych — Marzenna Nowicka · Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS