Reassigning sources of misophonic trigger sounds to change their unpleasantness: Testing alternative mechanisms with a new set of movies, paintings, and words

We conducted nine experiments to determine why a sound's pleasantness can be altered by movies, abstract paintings, and words. In Expt. 1, unpleasant sounds, such as the sound of a person sniffing, were paired either with their original video track or with video tracks depicting neutral events that could plausibly have produced the sound, such as pulling tissues out of a tissue box. While the unpleasant sounds were mildly unpleasant to an unscreened population, these sounds were expected to be more unpleasant for people who have misophonia, a condition in which certain everyday sounds are unbearable. Consistent with past literature, neutral video tracks increased the sounds' pleasantness for the non-misophonic and misophonic populations, by 0.98 and 1.59 points, respectively (on an 11-point scale). Movies rated as having better audio-visual matches produced greater changes in pleasantness, consistent with the hypothesis that source reassignment caused the changes. Expt. 2 found a consistent result when the video tracks were replaced with written event descriptions, although the effect size was reduced. Expt. 3 inverted Expt. 1 and found that unpleasant video tracks decreased the pleasantness of neutral sounds by 2.12 points, but better-matching movies did not produce greater changes in pleasantness. In Expts. 4-6, we sought an alternative to the source reassignment explanation by obtaining ratings of audio-visual synchrony, cross-modal agreement in symbolism, source plausibility, and sound identifiability. No complete explanation was found for the effect of unpleasant videos. Furthermore, pleasant abstract paintings increased the pleasantness of unpleasant sounds by 0.37 points, correlating with cross-modal agreement but not with audio-visual match. Taken together, different types and patterns of match ratings can help discern the causal mechanisms by which visual stimuli affect sound pleasantness (e.g., source reassignment, cross-modal agreement).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321594
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassigning sources of misophonic trigger sounds to change their unpleasantness: Testing alternative mechanisms with a new set of movies, paintings, and words

Laurie M. Heller, Urszula Oszczapinska, Jessica M. Smith, Megan M. Julien
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Multisensory perception and integration
4.24
article

Reassigning sources of misophonic trigger sounds to change their unpleasantness: Testing alternative mechanisms with a new set of movies, paintings, and words

Laurie M. Heller, Urszula Oszczapinska, Jessica M. Smith, Megan M. Julien
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We conducted nine experiments to determine why a sound's pleasantness can be altered by movies, abstract paintings, and words. In Expt. 1, unpleasant sounds, such as the sound of a person sniffing, were paired either with their original video track or with video tracks depicting neutral events that could plausibly have produced the sound, such as pulling tissues out of a tissue box. While the unpleasant sounds were mildly unpleasant to an unscreened population, these sounds were expected to be more unpleasant for people who have misophonia, a condition in which certain everyday sounds are unbearable. Consistent with past literature, neutral video tracks increased the sounds' pleasantness for the non-misophonic and misophonic populations, by 0.98 and 1.59 points, respectively (on an 11-point scale). Movies rated as having better audio-visual matches produced greater changes in pleasantness, consistent with the hypothesis that source reassignment caused the changes. Expt. 2 found a consistent result when the video tracks were replaced with written event descriptions, although the effect size was reduced. Expt. 3 inverted Expt. 1 and found that unpleasant video tracks decreased the pleasantness of neutral sounds by 2.12 points, but better-matching movies did not produce greater changes in pleasantness. In Expts. 4-6, we sought an alternative to the source reassignment explanation by obtaining ratings of audio-visual synchrony, cross-modal agreement in symbolism, source plausibility, and sound identifiability. No complete explanation was found for the effect of unpleasant videos. Furthermore, pleasant abstract paintings increased the pleasantness of unpleasant sounds by 0.37 points, correlating with cross-modal agreement but not with audio-visual match. Taken together, different types and patterns of match ratings can help discern the causal mechanisms by which visual stimuli affect sound pleasantness (e.g., source reassignment, cross-modal agreement).

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Misophonia Research Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Multisensory perception and integration
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.