Validation of the Moral Foundation Vignettes in Latin America: The Scope of Moral Foundations Through the Lens of an Instrument

In this paper we examine the structural validity of the Spanish Translation of the Moral Foundations Vignettes, an instrument developed to measure moral judgement in the context of Moral Foundations Theory. With data from 3 countries (N = 1,650, through a polling agency) we identify a restricted set of items that fit the seven-factor solution implied by the theory. We conducted additional analyses (invariance testing and Differential Item Functioning) to examine the stability the results of the across countries. We found non-invariance and uniform differential functioning in a large number of items. Taken together these results suggest that although the current version of the MFV can be adequately used to measure moral judgement within societies, cross-cultural comparisons with this tool are restricted. Our validation raises questions about the cross-cultural validity of the instrument but also of some of the categories that underlie the intended measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collabra Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.128178
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Moral Foundation Vignettes in Latin America: The Scope of Moral Foundations Through the Lens of an Instrument

William Jiménez‐Leal, Santiago Amaya, Sam Murray, Gino Carmona
2 citations
Collabra Psychology
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
article

Validation of the Moral Foundation Vignettes in Latin America: The Scope of Moral Foundations Through the Lens of an Instrument

William Jiménez‐Leal, Santiago Amaya, Sam Murray, Gino Carmona
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper we examine the structural validity of the Spanish Translation of the Moral Foundations Vignettes, an instrument developed to measure moral judgement in the context of Moral Foundations Theory. With data from 3 countries (N = 1,650, through a polling agency) we identify a restricted set of items that fit the seven-factor solution implied by the theory. We conducted additional analyses (invariance testing and Differential Item Functioning) to examine the stability the results of the across countries. We found non-invariance and uniform differential functioning in a large number of items. Taken together these results suggest that although the current version of the MFV can be adequately used to measure moral judgement within societies, cross-cultural comparisons with this tool are restricted. Our validation raises questions about the cross-cultural validity of the instrument but also of some of the categories that underlie the intended measurements.

Collabra PsychologyVol. 11(1)
Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Providence College (US)
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Business and Education
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.