Unlocking the potential of global greenhouse gas mitigation by reducing food loss and waste

Food loss and waste (FLW) are significant yet under-addressed contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the effectiveness of current FLW mitigation policies and valorization technologies remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to fill this gap by quantifying global FLW-related GHG emissions across four major commodity groups—(1) cereals and pulses, (2) fruits and vegetables, (3) meat and animal products, and (4) roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops—using region-specific emission factors and supply chain data. Furthermore, it evaluates the potential for life-cycle GHG reductions by implementing achievable policy measures and food waste valorization strategies on a global scale. FLW contributes significantly to global GHG emissions, estimated at 6.8 Gt-CO 2 eq per year (95 % CI = [6.5, 7.1]; p < 0.05). A substantial portion of GHG emissions occurs earlier in the supply chain, particularly during agricultural production and post-harvest handling due to infrastructure and technological limitations. Reducing 50 % food waste at retail and consumer levels could result in a ∼21 % decrease in the total FLW-related GHG emissions (i.e., 1.4 Gt-CO 2 eq (95 % CI = [1.0, 1.9]; p < 0.05) for the four major commodity groups. However, reducing 50 % FLW at all levels together with food waste valorization using anaerobic digestion can achieve a ∼70 % reduction (4.8 Gt-CO 2 eq per year; 95 % CI = [4.2, 5.3]; p < 0.05) in the total FLW-related GHG emissions. These findings highlight the importance of targeted, integrated strategies—including improved cold storage, sustainable procurement, and circular economy practices—for achieving meaningful emission reductions. While significant mitigation is possible, realizing these benefits will require coordinated global action and context-specific implementation. Our study provides a quantitative foundation for prioritizing interventions in FLW management to support climate goals and enhance food system sustainability. • Global FLW contributes ∼6.8 Gt-CO 2 eq/year, with meat products as largest emitter. • Reducing 50 % FW results in a ∼21 % decrease in the total FLW-related GHG emissions. • Reducing 50 % FLW with FW valorization by AD achieves ∼70 % GHG emission reduction. • China, India, and the U.S. offer the highest GHG reduction potential. • FW valorization via AD proves more effective than incineration for GHG mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101925
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking the potential of global greenhouse gas mitigation by reducing food loss and waste

Suraj Negi, Hyunook Kim, Aishwarya Rani, Taira Hidaka et al.
3 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
3.49
article

Unlocking the potential of global greenhouse gas mitigation by reducing food loss and waste

Suraj Negi, Hyunook Kim, Aishwarya Rani, Taira Hidaka, Liang‐Shih Fan, Shu-Yuan Pan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Food loss and waste (FLW) are significant yet under-addressed contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the effectiveness of current FLW mitigation policies and valorization technologies remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to fill this gap by quantifying global FLW-related GHG emissions across four major commodity groups—(1) cereals and pulses, (2) fruits and vegetables, (3) meat and animal products, and (4) roots, tubers, and oil-bearing crops—using region-specific emission factors and supply chain data. Furthermore, it evaluates the potential for life-cycle GHG reductions by implementing achievable policy measures and food waste valorization strategies on a global scale. FLW contributes significantly to global GHG emissions, estimated at 6.8 Gt-CO 2 eq per year (95 % CI = [6.5, 7.1]; p < 0.05). A substantial portion of GHG emissions occurs earlier in the supply chain, particularly during agricultural production and post-harvest handling due to infrastructure and technological limitations. Reducing 50 % food waste at retail and consumer levels could result in a ∼21 % decrease in the total FLW-related GHG emissions (i.e., 1.4 Gt-CO 2 eq (95 % CI = [1.0, 1.9]; p < 0.05) for the four major commodity groups. However, reducing 50 % FLW at all levels together with food waste valorization using anaerobic digestion can achieve a ∼70 % reduction (4.8 Gt-CO 2 eq per year; 95 % CI = [4.2, 5.3]; p < 0.05) in the total FLW-related GHG emissions. These findings highlight the importance of targeted, integrated strategies—including improved cold storage, sustainable procurement, and circular economy practices—for achieving meaningful emission reductions. While significant mitigation is possible, realizing these benefits will require coordinated global action and context-specific implementation. Our study provides a quantitative foundation for prioritizing interventions in FLW management to support climate goals and enhance food system sustainability. • Global FLW contributes ∼6.8 Gt-CO 2 eq/year, with meat products as largest emitter. • Reducing 50 % FW results in a ∼21 % decrease in the total FLW-related GHG emissions. • Reducing 50 % FLW with FW valorization by AD achieves ∼70 % GHG emission reduction. • China, India, and the U.S. offer the highest GHG reduction potential. • FW valorization via AD proves more effective than incineration for GHG mitigation.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 21
University of Seoul (KR), National Taiwan University (TW), Kyoto University (JP), The Ohio State University (US)
Ministry of Education, National Taiwan University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.