Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer+ Patients’ Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling and Experiences of Coercion in Contraceptive Care

Although one in three U.S. contraceptive clients identify as something other than heterosexual, research has overlooked associations between sexual identity and experiences of provider-based contraceptive coercion - that is, pressure from a healthcare provider to use or not use birth control. In 2023, we used the online Prolific panel to survey U.S. reproductive-age people assigned female at birth about their contraceptive care (<i>N</i> = 1,399; mean age = 32.6, <i>SD</i> = 8.24). We assessed differences in contraceptive care preferences and coercion across sexual identities and used open-ended survey responses to contextualize participants' contraceptive coercion experiences. More than one-third (36%) of the sample identified as lesbian/gay, bisexual, asexual, pansexual, queer, questioning, or preferred to self-identify (hereafter LGBQ+). Compared to heterosexual participants, LGBQ+ participants were more likely to experience misalignment in how often they would like contraceptive counseling versus how often they received it. Among those who ever received contraceptive counseling (<i>n</i> = 1,197), LGBQ+ individuals were also more likely than heterosexuals to experience pressure to use contraception. Open-ended responses revealed LGBQ+ clients' experiences with heteronormative assumptions during contraceptive care. Healthcare systems and providers must provide patient-centered contraceptive care to all individuals, with attention to how sexual identity can shape contraceptive needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2488365
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer+ Patients’ Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling and Experiences of Coercion in Contraceptive Care

Lindsay M. Cannon, Laura E. T. Swan, Jenny A. Higgins, Madison Lands
1 citations
The Journal of Sex Research
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.88
article

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer+ Patients’ Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling and Experiences of Coercion in Contraceptive Care

Lindsay M. Cannon, Laura E. T. Swan, Jenny A. Higgins, Madison Lands
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although one in three U.S. contraceptive clients identify as something other than heterosexual, research has overlooked associations between sexual identity and experiences of provider-based contraceptive coercion - that is, pressure from a healthcare provider to use or not use birth control. In 2023, we used the online Prolific panel to survey U.S. reproductive-age people assigned female at birth about their contraceptive care (<i>N</i> = 1,399; mean age = 32.6, <i>SD</i> = 8.24). We assessed differences in contraceptive care preferences and coercion across sexual identities and used open-ended survey responses to contextualize participants' contraceptive coercion experiences. More than one-third (36%) of the sample identified as lesbian/gay, bisexual, asexual, pansexual, queer, questioning, or preferred to self-identify (hereafter LGBQ+). Compared to heterosexual participants, LGBQ+ participants were more likely to experience misalignment in how often they would like contraceptive counseling versus how often they received it. Among those who ever received contraceptive counseling (<i>n</i> = 1,197), LGBQ+ individuals were also more likely than heterosexuals to experience pressure to use contraception. Open-ended responses revealed LGBQ+ clients' experiences with heteronormative assumptions during contraceptive care. Healthcare systems and providers must provide patient-centered contraceptive care to all individuals, with attention to how sexual identity can shape contraceptive needs.

The Journal of Sex Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Society of Family Planning
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.