Insights from search summary tables for evidence and gap maps: a case study on peer support interventions
The two SSTs indicated that MEDLINE and PsycINFO were key databases required for the identification of both systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials of peer support interventions, with the addition of CINAHL for systematic reviews, and CENTRAL for randomised controlled trials. For both study types, forward citation searching found additional included studies although it was more lucrative for identifying additional randomised controlled trials. Search summary tables are a simple way to share the effectiveness of the search methods chosen for a specific evidence synthesis project. The more SSTs we have, the more data we will have to inform evidence-based decisions on our search methods.
Authors
- Morwenna Rogers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-238X)
- Rebecca Abbott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-4484)
- Naomi Shaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-1809)
- Siân de Bell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-3849)
- Alison Bethel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0963-9201)
- Jo Thompson Coon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-0234)
- Anna Price (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-1876)
- Rob Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-8559)
Institutions
- University of Exeter (GB)
- NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB)
- Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
- Published
- 2025-04-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.1831
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00