Period, Course, and Rest in <i>The Faerie Queene</i>

This essay describes Spenser’s engagement with periodicity in The Faerie Queene. It argues that Spenser combines periodic units of onward movement with moments of punctuative stillness—course and rest—in order to achieve what E.K. identifies in The Shepheardes Calender as a vital effect of Spenserian authorship: that “what in most English wryters vseth to be loose” is rather “finely framed, and strongly trussed vp together.” It shows how periodic form was articulated by Aristotle, rhetoricians Demetrius and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and Renaissance theorists George Puttenham and Samuel Daniel, and it uses Paul Ricoeur’s work to confirm the stakes of this critical tradition as the “followability” of the text, its capacity for sustained literary efficacy across manifold narrative elements. This capacity is illustrated with reference to two major examples from Book IV: the reunification of Timias and Belphoebe, and Scudamour’s account of his circuitous journey through the Temple of Venus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733376
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Period, Course, and Rest in The Faerie Queene

Conor Wilcox-Mahon
Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

Period, Course, and Rest in The Faerie Queene

Conor Wilcox-Mahon
article en

Abstract

This essay describes Spenser’s engagement with periodicity in The Faerie Queene. It argues that Spenser combines periodic units of onward movement with moments of punctuative stillness—course and rest—in order to achieve what E.K. identifies in The Shepheardes Calender as a vital effect of Spenserian authorship: that “what in most English wryters vseth to be loose” is rather “finely framed, and strongly trussed vp together.” It shows how periodic form was articulated by Aristotle, rhetoricians Demetrius and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and Renaissance theorists George Puttenham and Samuel Daniel, and it uses Paul Ricoeur’s work to confirm the stakes of this critical tradition as the “followability” of the text, its capacity for sustained literary efficacy across manifold narrative elements. This capacity is illustrated with reference to two major examples from Book IV: the reunification of Timias and Belphoebe, and Scudamour’s account of his circuitous journey through the Temple of Venus.

Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry AnnualVol. 39(1)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.