Failure to launch: An analysis of an attempted central kitchen pilot program to serve childcare meals

The majority of children ages 0–5 consume most of their meals in early care and education (ECE) settings, prompting interest in the nutritional qual­ity of childcare meals and snacks as a vehicle for improving dietary-related health outcomes for this vulnerable population.[1] Our team has identified central kitchens that serve prepared meals to child­care centers as a potential model to improve meal quality for children, while also relieving childcare providers of the burdens of meal preparation and paperwork associated with federal meal reimburse­ments, and aggregating local food purchases to cre­ate a larger market for farmers than purchases by individual centers. Our team partnered with a funder, a church, and community organizations to attempt a pilot that would replicate this central kitchen model in a rural area. Unfortunately, the pilot project was never fully realized, leading us to conduct a process evaluation to identify the gener­alizable factors that impeded its success. We identi­fied four key factors, including the underlying power dynamic between the funder and recipient, reliance on a single project champion, lack of buy-in from community stakeholders, and failure to involve the county health department early in the planning process. In this paper, we construct a timeline of the project to help identify key factors that led to the project’s failure to launch, explain our four key findings, and provide a set of recom­mendations that funders and other communities can take into consideration as they consider the viability of this timely intervention. [1] We define children as vulnerable based on the fact that they are completely dependent on adults for decision-making that affects their health and well-being, which is especially true for children in the 0–5 age group (Bagattini, 2019).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2025.142.015
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure to launch: An analysis of an attempted central kitchen pilot program to serve childcare meals

Caroline Hundley, Emma Brinkmeyer, J. Dara Bloom, David C. Yates et al.
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Failure to launch: An analysis of an attempted central kitchen pilot program to serve childcare meals

Caroline Hundley, Emma Brinkmeyer, J. Dara Bloom, David C. Yates, Gizem Templeton
article en

Abstract

The majority of children ages 0–5 consume most of their meals in early care and education (ECE) settings, prompting interest in the nutritional qual­ity of childcare meals and snacks as a vehicle for improving dietary-related health outcomes for this vulnerable population.[1] Our team has identified central kitchens that serve prepared meals to child­care centers as a potential model to improve meal quality for children, while also relieving childcare providers of the burdens of meal preparation and paperwork associated with federal meal reimburse­ments, and aggregating local food purchases to cre­ate a larger market for farmers than purchases by individual centers. Our team partnered with a funder, a church, and community organizations to attempt a pilot that would replicate this central kitchen model in a rural area. Unfortunately, the pilot project was never fully realized, leading us to conduct a process evaluation to identify the gener­alizable factors that impeded its success. We identi­fied four key factors, including the underlying power dynamic between the funder and recipient, reliance on a single project champion, lack of buy-in from community stakeholders, and failure to involve the county health department early in the planning process. In this paper, we construct a timeline of the project to help identify key factors that led to the project’s failure to launch, explain our four key findings, and provide a set of recom­mendations that funders and other communities can take into consideration as they consider the viability of this timely intervention. [1] We define children as vulnerable based on the fact that they are completely dependent on adults for decision-making that affects their health and well-being, which is especially true for children in the 0–5 age group (Bagattini, 2019).

Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US), North Central State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.