Narrowing the ecological yield gap to sustain crop yields with less inputs

Sustainable production of sufficient and healthy food requires efficient use of agricultural inputs. In many regions of the world with intensive agriculture and relatively small yield gaps, this calls for a reduction of external inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) while maintaining yields. Ecological intensification, defined as the use of practices that enhance on-farm ecosystem services to reduce external input requirements, has been proposed as a strategy to help achieve this. However, the effects of ecological intensification are context- and input-dependent, creating uncertainty on its effectiveness and feasibility. Here, we introduce the concept of an ‘ecological yield gap’ to provide a common analytical framework to strengthen collaboration between agronomists and ecologists in assessing the contribution of ecosystem services within the wider array of inputs, management practices, technologies, and biophysical limits that determine on-farm crop yields. We define the ecological yield gap as the yield increase that could be achieved in a given context (climate x soil x cropping system), and at a given input level, by increasing the delivery of ecosystem services via ecological intensification practices that support crop growth and substitute external inputs. We provide empirical examples of such practices, including crop diversification, service crops, and organic amendments that can increase the use efficiency of mineral fertilizers and suppress pests, weeds and diseases. The potential of these practices to narrow the ecological yield gap and their feasibility at farm level depend on how the ecosystem services they provide interact with other aspects of the farming system and requires analysis at farm level. This perspective paper aims to facilitate a shared research agenda among agronomists and ecologists to develop complementarity between ecosystem services and inputs at field and farm levels. • Large variation in input use and use efficiency suggests scope to improve environmental performance without yield loss. • The ‘ecological yield gap’ captures benefits of ecosystem services delivered by ecological intensification practices. • Effects of practices are studied in the context of other growth factors using production functions and the farm context. • Empirical examples relate to crop diversification and organic amendments. • The approach is proposed to facilitate collaboration between ecologists and agronomists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Food Security
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100857
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrowing the ecological yield gap to sustain crop yields with less inputs

‪João Vasco Silva, Ingrid Öborn, Ola Lundin, Romain Nandillon et al.
4 citations
Global Food Security
Climate change impacts on agriculture
12.11
article

Narrowing the ecological yield gap to sustain crop yields with less inputs

‪João Vasco Silva, Ingrid Öborn, Ola Lundin, Romain Nandillon, Riccardo Bommarco, M.K. van Ittersum, Christine Watson, Renske Hijbeek, Alexander Menegat, Wytse J. Vonk, Giulia Vico, Göran Bergkvist, Frederick L. Stoddard, Chloe MacLaren, Annika Söderholm-Emas
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sustainable production of sufficient and healthy food requires efficient use of agricultural inputs. In many regions of the world with intensive agriculture and relatively small yield gaps, this calls for a reduction of external inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) while maintaining yields. Ecological intensification, defined as the use of practices that enhance on-farm ecosystem services to reduce external input requirements, has been proposed as a strategy to help achieve this. However, the effects of ecological intensification are context- and input-dependent, creating uncertainty on its effectiveness and feasibility. Here, we introduce the concept of an ‘ecological yield gap’ to provide a common analytical framework to strengthen collaboration between agronomists and ecologists in assessing the contribution of ecosystem services within the wider array of inputs, management practices, technologies, and biophysical limits that determine on-farm crop yields. We define the ecological yield gap as the yield increase that could be achieved in a given context (climate x soil x cropping system), and at a given input level, by increasing the delivery of ecosystem services via ecological intensification practices that support crop growth and substitute external inputs. We provide empirical examples of such practices, including crop diversification, service crops, and organic amendments that can increase the use efficiency of mineral fertilizers and suppress pests, weeds and diseases. The potential of these practices to narrow the ecological yield gap and their feasibility at farm level depend on how the ecosystem services they provide interact with other aspects of the farming system and requires analysis at farm level. This perspective paper aims to facilitate a shared research agenda among agronomists and ecologists to develop complementarity between ecosystem services and inputs at field and farm levels. • Large variation in input use and use efficiency suggests scope to improve environmental performance without yield loss. • The ‘ecological yield gap’ captures benefits of ecosystem services delivered by ecological intensification practices. • Effects of practices are studied in the context of other growth factors using production functions and the farm context. • Empirical examples relate to crop diversification and organic amendments. • The approach is proposed to facilitate collaboration between ecologists and agronomists.

Global Food SecurityVol. 45
University of Helsinki (FI), Scotland's Rural College (GB), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Agroécologie (FR), Institut Agro Dijon (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.