GenAI in Academic Writing- Empowering Learners or Redefining Traditional Pedagogical Practices?

This systematic literature review explores the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in English academic writing by English as a foreign language and English as a second language students and university faculty in higher education. By analyzing 46 articles from 2019–2023, the review examines the purposes and functions of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, their role in addressing writing challenges, and educators' strategies for ethical integration. Automated writing evaluation systems, such as Grammarly, Criterion, Quillbot, and ChatGPT, primarily enhance linguistic accuracy, vocabulary sophistication, and select higher-order writing skills. These tools also support learner confidence and reduce writing anxiety, though engagement with feedback varies. Educators employ diverse strategies, including blended feedback and task-specific AI use. The review identifies substantial improvements in grammar, mechanics, and essay structure but notes limited effects on advanced critical thinking. It underscores the need for balanced pedagogical practices that foster independent writing skills and recommends further research on adaptive AI technologies and innovative instructional approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijaitl.373582
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI in Academic Writing- Empowering Learners or Redefining Traditional Pedagogical Practices?

Chunfeng Ma, Sheri Vasinda, Yuxian Zhu, Sidra Zaheer
1 citations
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
article

GenAI in Academic Writing- Empowering Learners or Redefining Traditional Pedagogical Practices?

Chunfeng Ma, Sheri Vasinda, Yuxian Zhu, Sidra Zaheer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This systematic literature review explores the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in English academic writing by English as a foreign language and English as a second language students and university faculty in higher education. By analyzing 46 articles from 2019–2023, the review examines the purposes and functions of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, their role in addressing writing challenges, and educators' strategies for ethical integration. Automated writing evaluation systems, such as Grammarly, Criterion, Quillbot, and ChatGPT, primarily enhance linguistic accuracy, vocabulary sophistication, and select higher-order writing skills. These tools also support learner confidence and reduce writing anxiety, though engagement with feedback varies. Educators employ diverse strategies, including blended feedback and task-specific AI use. The review identifies substantial improvements in grammar, mechanics, and essay structure but notes limited effects on advanced critical thinking. It underscores the need for balanced pedagogical practices that foster independent writing skills and recommends further research on adaptive AI technologies and innovative instructional approaches.

International Journal of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 1(1)
University of Florida (US), Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.